ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2024
Dislocated 4-haptic intraocular lens rescue with Gore-tex suture scleral re-fixation.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Haptic pupillary capture secondary to in-the-bag intraocular lens anterior dislocation.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical outcome of rescuing dislocated Akreos intraocular lens with closed continuous-loop suture.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Rescue of a dislocated intraocular lens with silicone tip aspiration: a novel technique.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- The retrograde suture needle threading technique for in-situ repositioning of dislocated intraocular lenses with eyelets.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDislocated IOL exchange conventionally involves manipulation within the anterior chamber which risks secondary injury to anterior chamber structures. We describe and evaluate a 4-haptic IOL rescue technique that avoids entering the anterior chamber and thus minimizes post operative inflammation, astigmatism and recovery time relative to conventional IOL explantation and replacement techniques.
methodsRetrospective, non-randomized, interventional study of all patients undergoing 4-haptic IOL rescue performed by two independent vitreoretinal surgeons at a single UK centre over two years. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: A limited peritomy is performed with four 25-gauge scleral ports placed to enable use of two forceps, an infusion and a chandelier. A further four 27-gauge sclerotomies are symmetrically placed on the nasal and temporal sclera at 3 mm from the limbus with a 5 mm vertical separation on either side. A pars plana vitrectomy is performed followed by chandelier illuminated, bimanual cleaning of the dislocated IOL using 27-gauge serrated forceps. Gore-tex sutures are threaded through the IOL islets within the vitreous cavity and externalized through the sclerotomies for scleral re-fixation followed by conjunctival closure.
resultsSeven patients underwent IOL recycling with Gore-Tex suture scleral re-fixation. All procedures were successful in repositioning the IOLs, with all patients satisfied with post-operative outcome. Mean (standard deviation) time to IOL dislocation was 13 (3) years. Median visual acuity significantly improved post-operatively from 0.85 logMAR (Interquartile Range [IQR]: 0.2-2.1) to 0.07 (0.02-0.60) logMAR (p = 0.02). No significant post-operative complications were noted apart from persistent cystoid macular oedema in one patient non-compliant with post-operative treatment.
conclusionsTransscleral refixation using Gore-Tex suture is an effective, safe and practical approach in the management of dislocated 4-piece IOLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.