Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38972931›Full record

SynthesisJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025

Complementary and Alternative Medicine for Autism - A Systematic Review.

Monica Doherty, Kitty-Rose Foley, Janet Schloss

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Neuroimmunology of Autism.Molecular neurobiology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Monica DohertyFaculty of Health, National Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross University, 1 Military Road, Lismore, NSW, 2480, Australia. m.doherty.12@student.scu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7438-3960
Kitty-Rose FoleyFaculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Gold Coast, Qld, 4225, Australia.
Janet SchlossFaculty of Health, National Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Southern Cross University, 1 Military Road, Lismore, NSW, 2480, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) is a therapeutic option currently used by autistic people with continued interest and uptake. There remains limited evidence regarding the efficacy of CAM use in autism. The aim of this systematic review is to comprehensively review published clinical trials to explore the efficacy of CAM in autism. A systematic literature review of available research published from June 2013 to March 2023 was conducted. Our literature search identified 1826 eligible citations, and duplications removed (n = 694) with 102 articles eligible for title/abstract screening. After full text review, 39 studies were included. The results of this systematic review identified that for autistic people, vitamin and mineral supplements may only be of benefit if there is a deficiency. The results also found that the main interventions used were dietary interventions and nutraceuticals, including targeted supplements, vitamins and minerals, omega 3 s and prebiotics, probiotics and digestive enzymes. The evidence does not support some of the most frequently utilised dietary interventions, such as a Gluten Free Casein Free (GFCF) diet, and the use of targeted nutraceutical supplements may be of benefit, but more conclusive research is still required to direct safe and effective treatment.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderComplementary TherapiesDietary SupplementsHumansVitaminsVitaminsAutismAutisticComplementary and alternative medicineDietary interventionsNutraceuticals

Identifiers

PMID38972931
PMCPMC12476390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.