Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38972901›Full record

ArticleProgress in orthodontics2024

Clear aligner therapy practices among orthodontists practicing in Canada.

Djessyca Miranda E Paulo, Letícia Fernanda Moreira-Santos, Maisa Costa Tavares, Tony Weir, Maurice J Meade, Carlos Flores-Mir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in orthodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Djessyca Miranda E PauloSchool of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.
Letícia Fernanda Moreira-SantosDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Maisa Costa TavaresDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Tony WeirOrthodontic Unit, Adelaide Dental School, Adelaide Health and Medical Sciences Building, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Maurice J MeadeOrthodontic Unit, Adelaide Dental School, Adelaide Health and Medical Sciences Building, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Carlos Flores-MirDepartment of Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, Edmonton, AB, 5-528, T6G 1C2, Canada. cf1@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0887-9385

Funding

CAPES CAPES
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe acceptability and preference for clear aligner therapy (CAT) has been increasing among orthodontists, but there is still a lack of consensus regarding CAT best practices. Consequently, this study aimed to investigate CAT practices among orthodontists practicing in Canada.

methodsThe survey was conducted among orthodontists practicing in Canada using a modified previously published survey. Sixty orthodontists participated (6.1% response rate). It consisted of 11 sections with open and closed questions related to demographic information and particularities about using or not using CAT. The survey responses were exported from REDCap to a Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, Wash) spreadsheet, then statistically analyzed using SPSS software (SPSS for Windows, version 21.0; IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA). The comments were categorized under themes and subthemes. Data were organized in descriptive statistics, expressing frequencies and percentages.

resultsAlmost 30% of the orthodontist's annual caseload was treated with CAT, most frequently prescribed to adult patients. Case complexity and patient cooperation were the factors that most influenced the decision to prescribe CAT. Almost half of orthodontists reported sometimes combining CAT with adjunctive fixed appliances.

conclusionsMost orthodontists prescribe CAT, and its use is based on the malocclusion's complexity. Orthodontists who do not prescribe CAT believe that fixed appliance therapy has superior treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

OrthodontistsPractice Patterns, Dentists'AdultCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMalocclusionOrthodontic Appliance DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesClear Aligner AppliancesDental Health surveysOrthodontics

Identifiers

PMID38972901
PMCPMC11228011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.