Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38972863›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurogastroenterology and motility2024

Treatment Response With Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers Based on Clinical Phenotypes of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.

Seungyeon Seo, Hye-Kyung Jung, C Prakash Gyawali, Hye Ah Lee, Hyung Seok Lim, Eui Sun Jeong, Seong Eun Kim, Chang Mo Moon

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Acid peptic disorder compass: An Indian expert consensus on comprehensive management.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. [Drug Therapy for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Seungyeon SeoDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Hye-Kyung JungDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
C Prakash GyawaliDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Hye Ah LeeClinical Trial Center, Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Hyung Seok LimDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Eui Sun JeongDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Seong Eun KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Chang Mo MoonDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is typically managed based on the clinical phenotype. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) in patients with various clinical GERD phenotypes. Methods: Core databases were searched for studies comparing PCABs and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in clinical GERD phenotypes of erosive reflux disease (ERD), non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), PPI-resistant GERD and night-time heartburn. Additional analysis was performed based on disease severity and drug dosage, and pooled efficacy was calculated. Results: In 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the initial treatment of ERD, the risk ratio for healing with PCABs versus PPIs was 1.09 (95% CI, 1.04-1.13) at 2 weeks and 1.03 (95% CI, 1.00-1.07) at 8 weeks, respectively. PCABs exhibited a significant increase in both initial and sustained healing of ERD compared to PPIs in RCTs, driven particularly in severe ERD (Los Angeles grade C/D). In 3 NERD RCTs, PCAB was superior to placebo in proportion of days without heartburn. Observational studies on PPI-resistant symptomatic GERD reported symptom frequency improvement in 86.3% of patients, while 90.7% showed improvement in PPIresistant ERD across 5 observational studies. Two RCTs for night-time heartburn had different endpoints, limiting meta-analysis. Pronounced hypergastrinemia was observed in patients treated with PCABs. Conclusions: Compared to PPIs, PCABs have superior efficacy and faster therapeutic effect in the initial and maintenance therapy of ERD, particularly severe ERD. While PCABs may be an alternative treatment option in NERD and PPI-resistant GERD, findings were inconclusive in patients with night-time heartburn.

Indexed as

Gastroesophageal refluxMeta-analysisPotassium-competitive acid blockerProton pump inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID38972863
PMCPMC11238110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.