ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025
Identification of a subpopulation of highly adherent endothelial cells for seeding synthetic vascular grafts.
Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cell manufacturing for cell-based tissue engineering: a focus on vascularized, skeletal muscle regeneration.Frontiers in chemical engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThere is an unmet clinical need for alternatives to autologous vessel grafts. Small-diameter (<6 mm) synthetic vascular grafts are not suitable because of unacceptable patency rates. This mainly occurs due to the lack of an endothelial cell (EC) monolayer to prevent platelet activation, thrombosis, and intimal hyperplasia. There are no reliable methods to endothelialize small-diameter grafts because most seeded ECs are lost due to exposure to fluid shear stress after implantation. The goal of this work is to determine if EC loss is a random process or if it is possible to predict which cells are more likely to remain adherent.
methodsIn initial studies, we sorted ECs using fluid shear stress and identified a subpopulation of ECs that are more likely to resist detachment. We use RNA sequencing to examine gene expression of adherent ECs compared with the whole population. Using fluorescence activated cell sorting, we sorted ECs based on the expression level of a candidate marker and studied their retention in small-diameter vascular grafts in vitro.
resultsTranscriptomic analysis revealed that fibronectin leucine rich transmembrane protein 2 (FLRT2), encoding protein FLRT2, is downregulated in the ECs that are more likely to resist detachment. When seeded onto vascular grafts and exposed to shear stress, ECs expressing low levels of FLRT2 exhibit 59.2% ± 7.4% retention compared with 24.5% ± 6.1% retention for the remainder of the EC population.
conclusionsFor the first time, we show EC detachment is not an entirely random process. This provides validation for the concept that we can seed small-diameter vascular grafts only with highly adherent ECs to maintain a stable endothelium and improve graft patency rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.