ArticlePlacenta2024
Placental somatic mutation in human stillbirth and live birth: A pilot case-control study of paired placental, fetal, and maternal whole genomes.
Article in Placenta, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Replication stress primes a trophectoderm fate in embryonic stem cells.Cell death discovery · 2026Article
- Jumping in the human brain: A review on somatic transposition.Fundamental research · 2026Review
- Chromosomal instability in human trophoblast stem cells and placentas.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionA high frequency of single nucleotide somatic mutations in the placenta has been recently described, but its relationship to placental dysfunction is unknown.
methodsWe performed a pilot case-control study using paired fetal, maternal, and placental samples collected from healthy live birth controls (n = 10), live births with fetal growth restriction (FGR) due to placental insufficiency (n = 7), and stillbirths with FGR and placental insufficiency (n = 11). We quantified single nucleotide and structural somatic variants using bulk whole genome sequencing (30-60X coverage) in four biopsies from each placenta. We also assessed their association with clinical and histological evidence of placental dysfunction.
resultsSeventeen pregnancies had sufficiently high-quality placental, fetal, and maternal DNA for analysis. Each placenta had a median of 473 variants (range 111-870), with 95 % arising in just one biopsy within each placenta. In controls, live births with FGR, and stillbirths, the median variant counts per placenta were 514 (IQR 381-779), 582 (450-735), and 338 (245-441), respectively. After adjusting for depth of sequencing coverage and gestational age at birth, the somatic mutation burden was similar between groups (FGR live births vs. controls, adjusted diff. 59, 95 % CI -218 to +336; stillbirths vs controls, adjusted diff. -34, -351 to +419), and with no association with placental dysfunction (p = 0.7). DISCUSSION: We confirmed the high prevalence of somatic mutation in the human placenta and conclude that the placenta is highly clonal. We were not able to identify any relationship between somatic mutation burden and clinical or histologic placental insufficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.