Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38971951›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2024

Machine learning-based decision support model for selecting intra-arterial therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A national real-world evidence-based study.

Chao An, Ran Wei, Wendao Liu, Yan Fu, Xiaolong Gong, Chengzhi Li, Wang Yao, Mengxuan Zuo, Wang Li, Yansheng Li and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Chao An *Beijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ran Wei *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, Province Guangdong, China.
Wendao LiuDepartment of Interventional therapy, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine and Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, Province Guangdong, China.
Yan FuDepartment of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Xiaolong GongShandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Interventional Radiology Department, No. 440, Jiyan Road, Jinan, Shandong Province Jinan, Shandong, China.
Chengzhi LiDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Wang YaoDHC Mediway Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100190, China.
Mengxuan ZuoDepartment of Minimal Invasive intervention, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Wang LiDepartment of Minimal Invasive intervention, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Yansheng LiDHC Mediway Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100190, China.
Fatian WuDHC Mediway Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100190, China.
Kejia LiuDHC Mediway Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100190, China.
Dong YanBeijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. yd15yt88@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2483-4029
Peihong WuDepartment of Minimal Invasive intervention, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, China. wuph@sysucc.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8008-1872
Jianjun HanShandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Interventional Radiology Department, No. 440, Jiyan Road, Jinan, Shandong Province Jinan, Shandong, China. handoctor@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceIntra-arterial therapies(IATs) are promising options for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). Stratifying the prognostic risk before administering IAT is important for clinical decision-making and for designing future clinical trials.

objectiveTo develop and validate a machine learning(ML)-based decision support model(MLDSM) for recommending IAT modalities for unresectable HCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsBetween October 2014 and October 2022, a total of 2,959 patients with HCC who underwent initial IATs were enroled retrospectively from 13 tertiary hospitals. These patients were divided into the training cohort (n = 1700), validation cohort (n = 428), and test cohort (n = 200). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Thirty-two clinical variables were input, and five supervised ML algorithms, including eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Categorical Gradient Boosting (CatBoost), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM) and Random Forest (RF), were compared using the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with the DeLong test.

resultsA total of 1856 patients were assigned to the IAT alone Group(I-A), and 1103 patients were assigned to the IAT combination Group(I-C). The 12-month death rates were 31.9% (352/1103) in the I-A group and 50.4% (936/1856) in the I-C group. For the test cohort, in the I-C group, the CatBoost model achieved the best discrimination when 30 variables were input, with an AUC of 0.776 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.833-0.868). In the I-A group, the LGBM model achieved the best discrimination when 24 variables were input, with an AUC of 0.776 (95% CI, 0.833-0.868). According to the decision trees, BCLC grade, local therapy, and diameter as top three variables were used to guide clinical decisions between IAT modalities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The MLDSM can accurately stratify prognostic risk for HCC patients who received IATs, thus helping physicians to make decisions about IAT and providing guidance for surveillance strategies in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsMachine LearningAgedChemoembolization, TherapeuticClinical Decision-MakingDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38971951
PMCPMC11369107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.