ArticleEye (London, England)2024
Universal eye screening: perinatal risk factors and ocular abnormalities in 1795 newborns not meeting retinopathy of prematurity criteria.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of sight-threatening ocular abnormalities identified by retinal examination in neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Analysis of full-term neonatal eye disease screening results and trends from 2016 to 2023.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis prospective cohort study aimed to investigate the ocular outcomes of universal eye screening in newborns and assess the relationship between different perinatal risk factors and various ocular abnormalities in infants who do not meet the criteria for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening.
methodsAn universal eye screening questionnaire was utilised to screen newborn babies who did not meet the ROP screening criteria within 72 h of birth at a public and private hospital between June 2016 and April 2018. The questionnaire covered demographic characteristics, neonatal history, and eye examination findings. A trained retina specialist conducted comprehensive anterior and posterior segment examinations utilising a binocular indirect ophthalmoscope.
resultsOut of the 1795 newborns screened, 55.2% were male, and 44.8% were female. The most prevalent ocular abnormality observed was retinal haemorrhage (RH), with a prevalence of 10.64% (95% CI: 9.25-12.16%). The prevalence of non-RH abnormality was 7.5% (95% CI: 6.34-8.84%). The retinal haemorrhages were associated with normal vaginal deliveries (OR: 9.91; 95% CI: 6.71-14.64, p-value < 0.001), while non-RH abnormalities were associated with pre-term babies (OR: 4.87; 95% CI: 3.03-7.83, p < 0.001), consanguinity (OR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.28-3.8, p < 0.001), low birth weight (OR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.14-0.34, p < 0.001) and systemic abnormalities (OR: 3.08; 95% CI: 1.94-4.91, p < 0.001).
conclusionsSight-threatening ocular pathology in newborns may be linked to perinatal risk factors such as preterm birth, low birth weight, consanguinity, and systemic abnormalities. Accordingly, it may be prudent to consider specialized ocular screening protocols for neonates within this high-risk cohort in future prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.