Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38971911›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Functional data geometric morphometrics with machine learning for craniodental shape classification in shrews.

Aneesha Balachandran Pillay, Dharini Pathmanathan, Sophie Dabo-Niang, Arpah Abu, Hasmahzaiti Omar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aneesha Balachandran PillayFaculty of Science, Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Dharini PathmanathanFaculty of Science, Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. dharini@um.edu.my.
Sophie Dabo-NiangLaboratoire Paul Painlevé CNRS 8524, INRIA-MODAL, Université de Lille, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
Arpah AbuFaculty of Science, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Hasmahzaiti OmarFaculty of Science, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

Universiti Malaya GPF088-A2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work proposes a functional data analysis approach for morphometrics in classifying three shrew species (S. murinus, C. monticola, and C. malayana) from Peninsular Malaysia. Functional data geometric morphometrics (FDGM) for 2D landmark data is introduced and its performance is compared with classical geometric morphometrics (GM). The FDGM approach converts 2D landmark data into continuous curves, which are then represented as linear combinations of basis functions. The landmark data was obtained from 89 crania of shrew specimens based on three craniodental views (dorsal, jaw, and lateral). Principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis were applied to both GM and FDGM methods to classify the three shrew species. This study also compared four machine learning approaches (naïve Bayes, support vector machine, random forest, and generalised linear model) using predicted PC scores obtained from both methods (a combination of all three craniodental views and individual views). The analyses favoured FDGM and the dorsal view was the best view for distinguishing the three species.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPrincipal Component AnalysisShrewsAnimalsDiscriminant AnalysisMalaysiaSkullSupport Vector MachineFunctional data analysisGeometric morphometricsLandmarksLinear discriminant analysisPrincipal component analysisShrews

Identifiers

PMID38971911
PMCPMC11227550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.