ArticleScientific reports2024
Audio-visual modelling in a clinical setting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Auditory and visual signals are two primary perception modalities that are usually present together and correlate with each other, not only in natural environments but also in clinical settings. However, audio-visual modelling in the latter case can be more challenging, due to the different sources of audio/video signals and the noise (both signal-level and semantic-level) in auditory signals-usually speech audio. In this study, we consider audio-visual modelling in a clinical setting, providing a solution to learn medical representations that benefit various clinical tasks, without relying on dense supervisory annotations from human experts for the model training. A simple yet effective multi-modal self-supervised learning framework is presented for this purpose. The proposed approach is able to help find standard anatomical planes, predict the focusing position of sonographer's eyes, and localise anatomical regions of interest during ultrasound imaging. Experimental analysis on a large-scale clinical multi-modal ultrasound video dataset show that the proposed novel representation learning method provides good transferable anatomical representations that boost the performance of automated downstream clinical tasks, even outperforming fully-supervised solutions. Being able to learn such medical representations in a self-supervised manner will contribute to several aspects including a better understanding of obstetric imaging, training new sonographers, more effective assistive tools for human experts, and enhancement of the clinical workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.