Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38971806›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Children and adults produce distinct technology- and human-directed speech.

Michelle Cohn, Santiago Barreda, Katharine Graf Estes, Zhou Yu, Georgia Zellou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle CohnPhonetics Laboratory, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA. mdcohn@ucdavis.edu.
Santiago BarredaPhonetics Laboratory, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA.
Katharine Graf EstesLanguage Learning Lab, Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA.
Zhou YuNatural Language Processing (NLP) Lab, Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Georgia ZellouPhonetics Laboratory, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA.

Funding

Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences 1911855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compares how English-speaking adults and children from the United States adapt their speech when talking to a real person and a smart speaker (Amazon Alexa) in a psycholinguistic experiment. Overall, participants produced more effortful speech when talking to a device (longer duration and higher pitch). These differences also varied by age: children produced even higher pitch in device-directed speech, suggesting a stronger expectation to be misunderstood by the system. In support of this, we see that after a staged recognition error by the device, children increased pitch even more. Furthermore, both adults and children displayed the same degree of variation in their responses for whether "Alexa seems like a real person or not", further indicating that children's conceptualization of the system's competence shaped their register adjustments, rather than an increased anthropomorphism response. This work speaks to models on the mechanisms underlying speech production, and human-computer interaction frameworks, providing support for routinized theories of spoken interaction with technology.

Indexed as

SpeechAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMalePsycholinguisticsYoung AdultAnthropomorphismChildrenHuman–computer interactionSpeech adaptation

Identifiers

PMID38971806
PMCPMC11227501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.