Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38971793›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2024

Targeted axillary dissection reduces residual nodal disease in clinically node- positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Neslihan Cabıoğlu, Hasan Karanlık, Ravza Yılmaz, Selman Emiroğlu, Mustafa Tükenmez, Süleyman Bademler, Duygu Has Şimşek, Tarık Recep Kantarcı, İnci Kızıldağ Yirgin, Aysel Bayram and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of axillary disease extent defined by baselineBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Neslihan CabıoğluDepartment of Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye. neslicab@yahoo.com.
Hasan KaranlıkDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Istanbul University, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ravza YılmazDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Selman EmiroğluDepartment of Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Mustafa TükenmezDepartment of Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Süleyman BademlerDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Istanbul University, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Duygu Has ŞimşekDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Tarık Recep KantarcıDepartment of Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
İnci Kızıldağ YirginDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul University, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Aysel BayramDepartment of Pathology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Memduh DursunDepartment of Radiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAny advantage of performing targeted axillary dissection (TAD) compared to sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) is under debate in clinically node-positive (cN+) patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Our objective was to assess the feasibility of the removal of the clipped node (RCN) with TAD or without imaging-guided localisation by SLNB to reduce the residual axillary disease in completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) in cN+ breast cancer.

methodsA combined analysis of two prospective cohorts, including 253 patients who underwent SLNB with/without TAD and with/without ALND following NAC, was performed. Finally, 222 patients (cT1-3N1/ycN0M0) with a clipped lymph node that was radiologically visible were analyzed.

resultsOverall, the clipped node was successfully identified in 246 patients (97.2%) by imaging. Of 222 patients, the clipped lymph nodes were non-SLNs in 44 patients (19.8%). Of patients in cohort B (n=129) with TAD, the clipped node was successfully removed by preoperative image-guided localisation, or the clipped lymph node was removed as the SLN as detected on preoperative SPECT-CT. Among patients with ypSLN(+) (n=109), no significant difference was found in non-SLN positivity at cALND between patients with TAD and RCN (41.7% vs. 46.9%, p=0.581). In the subgroup with TAD with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND; n=60), however, patients with a lymph node (LN) ratio (LNR) less than 50% and one metastatic LN in the TAD specimen were found to have significantly decreased non-SLN positivity compared to others (27.6% vs. 54.8%, p=0.032, and 22.2% vs. 50%, p=0.046).

conclusionsTAD by imaging-guided localisation is feasible with excellent identification rates of the clipped node. This approach has also been found to reduce the additional non-SLN positivity rate to encourage omitting ALND in patients with a low metastatic burden undergoing TAD.

Indexed as

AxillaBreast NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm, ResidualSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMiddle AgedClipped nodeCT-guided localisationNeoadjuvant chemotherapyRadio-guided occult lesion localisation (ROLL)Residual nodal diseaseSentinel lymph node biopsyTargeted axillary dissectionWire-localisation

Identifiers

PMID38971793
PMCPMC11227135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.