Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38971756›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Effect of in-line filtration in newborns: study protocol of the Intravenous Neonatal Central Access Safety (INCAS) randomized controlled trial.

Francesco Cresi, Elena Maggiora, Cecilia Capetti, Martina Capitanio, Mattia Ferroglio, Elena Spada, Francesca De Matteis, Sara Cosimi, Fabio Mosca, Alessandra Coscia and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05537389 (Central Lines Filtration in Newborns), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05537389 narecruitingnot on this map

Central Lines Filtration in Newborns: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Turin, ItalyRan2023 to 2026Enrolled736ConditionsNewborn Complication, Catheter ComplicationsArmsIn-line filter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Francesco Cresi *Neonatal Pathology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Elena Maggiora *Neonatal Pathology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. elena.maggiora@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7491-468X
Cecilia Capetti *School of Specialization in Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Martina CapitanioNeonatal Pathology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Mattia FerroglioNeonatal Pathology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Elena SpadaNeonatal Pathology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Francesca De MatteisCittà della Salute e della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Sara CosimiCittà della Salute e della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Fabio MoscaNICU Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Alessandra CosciaNeonatal Pathology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
INCAS Trial Research Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParticulate contamination due to infusion therapy (administration of parenteral nutrition and medications) carries a potential health risk for infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). This particulate consists of metals, drug crystals, glass fragments, or cotton fibers and can be generated by drug packaging, incomplete reconstitution, and chemical incompatibilities. In-line filters have been shown to remove micro-organisms, endotoxin, air, and particles in critically ill adults and older infants, but its benefits in newborn remain to be demonstrated. Moreover, 50% of inflammatory episodes in the setting of NICUs are blood culture-negative. These episodes could be partly related to the presence of particles in the infusion lines.

methodsA multicenter randomized single-blind controlled trial was designed. All infants admitted to NICUs for which prolonged infusion therapy is expected will be enrolled in the study and randomized to the Filter or Control arm. All patients will be monitored until discharge, and data will be analyzed according to a "full analysis set." The primary outcome is the frequency of patients with at least one sepsis-like event, defined by any association of suspected sepsis symptoms with a level of c-reactive protein (CRP) > 5 mg/L in a negative-culture contest. The frequency of sepsis, phlebitis, luminal obstruction, and the duration of mechanical ventilation and of catheter days will be evaluated as secondary outcomes. The sample size was calculated at 368 patients per arm. DISCUSSION: This is the first multicenter randomized control trial that compares in-line filtration of parenteral nutrition and other intravenous drugs to infusion without filters. Sepsis-like events are commonly diagnosed in clinical practice and are more frequent than sepsis in a positive culture contest. The risk of these episodes in the target population is estimated at 30-35%, but this data is not confirmed in the literature. If the use of in-line filters results in a significant decrease in sepsis-like events and/or in any other complications, the use of in-line filters in all intravenous administration systems may be recommended in NICUs.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05537389, registered on 12 September 2022 ( https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/results/NCT05537389?view=results ).

Indexed as

FiltrationIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCatheterization, Central VenousC-Reactive ProteinHumansInfant, NewbornInfusions, IntravenousParenteral NutritionSepsisSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeC-Reactive ProteinCVC-complicationsFiltrationInfusion therapyNewbornPresepsinPretermRandomized controlled trialSepsis

Identifiers

PMID38971756
PMCPMC11227126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.