Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38971361›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental research2024

A case-cohort study of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance concentrations and incident prostate cancer in the cancer prevention Study-II LifeLink cohort study.

Alyssa N Troeschel, Lauren R Teras, James M Hodge, Juan Rodriguez, Ying Wang, Johnni Daniel, W Ryan Diver, Andrea Winquist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alyssa N TroeschelDivision of Environmental Health Science and Practice, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: rjz5@cdc.gov.
Lauren R TerasDepartment of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, United States.
James M HodgeDepartment of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Juan RodriguezDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Ying WangDepartment of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Johnni DanielDivision of Environmental Health Science and Practice, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
W Ryan DiverDepartment of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Andrea WinquistDivision of Environmental Health Science and Practice, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are environmentally persistent, potentially carcinogenic chemicals. Previous studies investigating PFAS exposure and prostate cancer yielded mixed findings. We aimed to investigate associations between PFAS exposure and incident prostate cancer in a large cohort of U.S. men, overall and by selected demographic, lifestyle, and medical-related characteristics.

methodsWe conducted a case-cohort study among Cancer Prevention Study-II LifeLink Cohort participants who, at baseline (1998-2001), had serum specimens collected and no prior cancer diagnosis. The study included all men diagnosed with prostate cancer (n = 1610) during follow-up (baseline-June 30, 2015) and a random sub-cohort of 500 men. PFAS concentrations [perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)] were measured in stored serum specimens. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to estimate associations between PFAS concentrations and prostate cancer, overall and by selected characteristics (grade, stage, family history, age, education, smoking status, and alcohol consumption).

resultsProstate cancer hazards were slightly higher among men with concentrations in the highest (Q4) vs lowest quartile (Q1) for PFHxS [hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI): 1.18 (0.88-1.59)] and PFOS [HR (95% CI): 1.18 (0.89-1.58)], but not for PFNA or PFOA. However, we observed heterogeneous associations by age, family history of prostate cancer (PFHxS), alcohol consumption (PFHxS), and education (PFNA). For example, no meaningful associations were observed among men aged <70 years at serum collection, but among men aged ≥70 years, HRs (95% CIs) comparing Q4 to Q1 were PFHxS 1.54 (1.02-2.31) and PFOS 1.62 (1.08-2.44). No meaningful heterogeneity in associations were observed by tumor grade or stage.

conclusionsOur findings do not clearly support an association between the PFAS considered and prostate cancer. However, positive associations observed in some subgroups, and consistently positive associations observed for PFHxS warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

FluorocarbonsProstatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAlkanesulfonic AcidsCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental PollutantsHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesAlkanesulfonic AcidsEnvironmental PollutantsFluorocarbonsCancerCase-cohort studyPFASProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID38971361
PMCPMC11563186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.