ArticleSurgical oncology2024
Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation of adrenal metastases secondary to lung cancer.
Article in Surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metastatic organ distribution characteristics and prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Prediction of solitary ≤3-cm small adrenal metastasis based onOncology letters · 2026Article
- Solitary adrenal metastasis presenting 15 years after breast cancer: a case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAssess safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for adrenal metastases (AM) secondary to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included patients with NSCLC AM treated with thermal ablation between 2/2010-11/2021. Local tumor progression free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.
resultsSeven patients (mean age ± SD, 63.9 ± 12.5 years; 6 males) with seven AM were treated in eight sessions. Retreatment was performed in one patient with residual disease. Five sessions were with microwave ablation and 3 with radiofrequency ablation. Mean tumor size was 20.1 ± 7.0 mm. Median number of ablation probes used was 1 (range, 1-5), with a median of 3 activations (range, 1-3), and average ablation time of 14.4 ± 15.0 minutes. Response based on RECIST v 1.1 or PERCIST criteria revealed stable disease in 1 tumor, progression of disease in 3 tumors (one was re-ablated), and partial response in 3 tumors. Median LTPFS was not reached (NR) [95 % CI: 1- NR]. Median OS was 47.97 months (95 % CI: 18.63- NR). Intraprocedural hypertension (blood pressure ≥180 mmHg) occurred during 5/8 (62.5 %) sessions and intraoperative tachycardia occurred during 2/8 (25 %) sessions. Complications within one month of ablation occurred in 3/8 (37.5 %) sessions: grade 2 pneumothorax, grade 1 hematuria, and grade 2 adrenal insufficiency.
conclusionsIn this small series, thermal ablation for NSCLC AM resulted in prolonged local control and OS with no major complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.