Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38970776›Full record

ArticleExperimental physiology2024

Post-exercise hot or cold water immersion does not alter perception of effort or neuroendocrine responses during subsequent moderate-intensity exercise.

Campbell Menzies, Neil D Clarke, Christopher J A Pugh, Charles J Steward, C Douglas Thake, Tom Cullen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Campbell MenziesCentre for Physical Activity, Sport & Exercise Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2546-1618
Neil D ClarkeCollege of Life Sciences, Faculty of Health, Education and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1909-329X
Christopher J A PughCardiff School of Sport & Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5932-4793
Charles J StewardCentre for Physical Activity, Sport & Exercise Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5405-4608
C Douglas ThakeCentre for Physical Activity, Sport & Exercise Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0632-2137
Tom CullenCentre for Physical Activity, Sport & Exercise Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9058-6716

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-exercise hot (HWI) and cold (CWI) water immersion are popular strategies used by athletes in a range of sporting contexts, such as enhancing recovery or adaptation. However, prolonged heating bouts increase neuroendocrine responses that are associated with perceptions of fatigue. Fourteen endurance-trained runners performed three trials consisting of two 45-min runs at 95% lactate threshold on a treadmill separated by 6 h of recovery. Following the first run, participants completed one of HWI (30 min, 40°C), CWI (15 min, 14°C) or control (CON, 30 min rest in ambient conditions) in a randomised order. Perceived effort and recovery were measured using ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and the Acute Recovery and Stress Scale (ARSS), whilst physiological responses including venous concentrations of a range of neuroendocrine markers, superficial femoral blood flow, heart rate and rectal temperature were measured. Exercise increased neuroendocrine responses of interleukin-6, adrenaline and noradrenaline (all P < 0.001). Additionally, perceptions of overall recovery (P < 0.001), mental performance capacity (P = 0.02), physical performance capability (P = 0.01) and emotional balance (P = 0.03) were reduced prior to the second run. However, there was no effect of condition on these variables (P > 0.05), nor RPE (P = 0.68), despite differences in rectal temperature, superficial femoral blood flow following the first run, and participants' expected recovery prior to the intervention (all P < 0.001). Therefore, athletes may engage in post-exercise hot or cold-water immersion without negatively impacting moderate-intensity training sessions performed later the same day.

Indexed as

Cold TemperatureExerciseHot TemperatureImmersionPerceptionPhysical ExertionAdultEpinephrineFemaleHeart RateHumansInterleukin-6MaleNeurosecretory SystemsNorepinephrineWaterEpinephrineInterleukin-6NorepinephrineWatercoolingexerciseheatingrecovery

Identifiers

PMID38970776
PMCPMC11363106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.