ArticleBiotechnology letters2024
Don't let valuable microbiome data go to waste: combined usage of merging and direct-joining of sequencing reads for low-quality paired-end amplicon data.
Article in Biotechnology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pernicious nature of low-quality sequencing data warrants improvement in the bioinformatics workflow for profiling microbial diversity. The conventional merging approach, which drops a copious amount of sequencing reads when processing low-quality amplicon data, requires alternative methods. In this study, a computational workflow, a combination of merging and direct-joining where the paired-end reads lacking overlaps are concatenated and pooled with the merged sequences, is proposed to handle the low-quality amplicon data. The proposed computational strategy was compared with two workflows; the merging approach where the paired-end reads are merged, and the direct-joining approach where the reads are concatenated. The results showed that the merging approach generates a significantly low number of amplicon sequences, limits the microbiome inference, and obscures some microbial associations. In comparison to other workflows, the combination of merging and direct-joining strategy reduces the loss of amplicon data, improves the taxonomy classification, and importantly, abates the misleading results associated with the merging approach when analysing the low-quality amplicon data. The mock community analysis also supports the findings. In summary, the researchers are suggested to follow the merging and direct-joining workflow to avoid problems associated with low-quality data while profiling the microbial community structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38970710What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.