Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38970710›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology letters2024

Don't let valuable microbiome data go to waste: combined usage of merging and direct-joining of sequencing reads for low-quality paired-end amplicon data.

Meganathan P Ramakodi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Meganathan P RamakodiCSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), Hyderabad Zonal Centre, IICT Campus, Tarnaka, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500007, India. meganathan.pr@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0034-6306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pernicious nature of low-quality sequencing data warrants improvement in the bioinformatics workflow for profiling microbial diversity. The conventional merging approach, which drops a copious amount of sequencing reads when processing low-quality amplicon data, requires alternative methods. In this study, a computational workflow, a combination of merging and direct-joining where the paired-end reads lacking overlaps are concatenated and pooled with the merged sequences, is proposed to handle the low-quality amplicon data. The proposed computational strategy was compared with two workflows; the merging approach where the paired-end reads are merged, and the direct-joining approach where the reads are concatenated. The results showed that the merging approach generates a significantly low number of amplicon sequences, limits the microbiome inference, and obscures some microbial associations. In comparison to other workflows, the combination of merging and direct-joining strategy reduces the loss of amplicon data, improves the taxonomy classification, and importantly, abates the misleading results associated with the merging approach when analysing the low-quality amplicon data. The mock community analysis also supports the findings. In summary, the researchers are suggested to follow the merging and direct-joining workflow to avoid problems associated with low-quality data while profiling the microbial community structure.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMicrobiotaBacteriaHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNAWorkflowAmpliconDirect-joiningLow-quality dataMergingMicrobial profilingMicrobiome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.