Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38970709›Full record

SynthesisInternational urology and nephrology2024

Artificial intelligence and machine learning in peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of clinical outcomes and predictive modeling.

Muhammad Muaz Mushtaq, Maham Mushtaq, Husnain Ali, Muhammad Asad Sarwar, Syed Faqeer Hussain Bokhari

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urology and nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Text mining for case report articles on "peritoneal dialysis" from PubMed database.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammad Muaz MushtaqKing Edward Medical University, Mayo Hospital, KEMU Boys Hostel, Link Mcleod Road, Lahore, Pakistan.
Maham MushtaqKing Edward Medical University, Mayo Hospital, KEMU Boys Hostel, Link Mcleod Road, Lahore, Pakistan.
Husnain AliKing Edward Medical University, Mayo Hospital, KEMU Boys Hostel, Link Mcleod Road, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Asad SarwarKing Edward Medical University, Mayo Hospital, KEMU Boys Hostel, Link Mcleod Road, Lahore, Pakistan.
Syed Faqeer Hussain BokhariKing Edward Medical University, Mayo Hospital, KEMU Boys Hostel, Link Mcleod Road, Lahore, Pakistan. drfhbokhari512@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) presents transformative opportunities for optimizing treatment outcomes and informing clinical decision-making. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the applications of AI/ML techniques in PD, focusing on their potential to predict clinical outcomes and enhance patient care. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines (2020), searching key databases for articles on AI and ML applications in PD. The inclusion criteria were stringent, ensuring the selection of high-quality studies. The search strategy comprised MeSH terms and keywords related to PD, AI, and ML. 793 articles were identified, with nine ultimately meeting the inclusion criteria. The review utilized a narrative synthesis approach to summarize findings due to anticipated study heterogeneity.

resultsNine studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies varied in sample size and employed diverse AI and ML techniques, reflecting the breadth of data considered. Mortality prediction emerged as a recurrent theme, demonstrating the significance of AI and ML in prognostic accuracy. Predictive modeling extended to technique failure, hospital stay prediction, and pathogen-specific immune responses, showcasing the versatility of AI and ML applications in PD.

conclusionsThis systematic review highlights the diverse applications of AI/ML in peritoneal dialysis, demonstrating their potential to enhance predictive accuracy, risk stratification, and decision support. However, limitations such as small sample sizes, single-center studies, and potential biases warrant further research and external validation. Future perspectives include integrating these AI/ML models into routine clinical practice and exploring additional use cases to improve patient outcomes and healthcare decision-making in PD.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningPeritoneal DialysisHumansTreatment OutcomeArtificial intelligenceClinical outcomesHealthcare decision supportMachine learningMortality predictionPeritoneal dialysisPredictive modelingSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.