ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024
Neonatal phototherapy and risk of epilepsy-A Danish population based study.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epilepsy in autism spectrum disorder: examining prevalence and associated factors in a large cross-sectional study.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the risk of epilepsy in children who received neonatal phototherapy. A cohort of live singletons born at a Danish hospital (2002-2016) with a gestational age ≥ 35 weeks. We used Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of epilepsy in children treated with neonatal phototherapy compared to children not treated with neonatal phototherapy in the general population, and in a subpopulation of children who had serum bilirubin measurement. Adjusted HRs (aHR) were computed using multivariable and propensity score matching models to take maternal and neonatal factors into consideration. Children were followed from day 29 after birth to diagnosis of epilepsy, death, emigration, or December 31, 2016. Among 65,365 children, 958 (1.5%) received neonatal phototherapy. Seven children (incidence rates (IRs): 10.8 /10,000 person-years) who received neonatal phototherapy and 354 children (IR: 7.7) who did not receive neonatal phototherapy were diagnosed with epilepsy. Neonatal phototherapy was not associated with an increased risk of epilepsy using the multivariable (aHR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.43-2.09) and propensity score matched (aHR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.39-2.28) models. In the subpopulation of 9,378 children with bilirubin measurement, 928 (9.9%) received neonatal phototherapy. In the analysis of the subpopulation in which bilirubin level and age at the time of bilirubin measurement were further taking into consideration, neonatal phototherapy was not associated with an increased risk of epilepsy using the multivariable (aHR 1.26, 95% CI: 0.54-2.97) and propensity score matched (aHR 1.24, 95% CI: 0.47-3.25) models,Conclusions: Neonatal phototherapy was not associated with an increased risk of epilepsy after taking maternal and neonatal factors into consideration. What is known: • A few studies have suggested that neonatal phototherapy for hyperbilirubinemia may increase the risk of childhood epilepsy. • Whether the observed associations contribute to hyperbilirubinemia, phototherapy, or underlying factors requires further investigation. What is new: • This study revealed no increased risk of epilepsy in children treated with neonatal phototherapy compared to children not treated with phototherapy after taking maternal and neonatal factors into consideration. • After further taking bilirubin level and age at the time of bilirubin measurement into consideration, neonatal phototherapy was not associated with an increased risk of epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.