Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38970642›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2024

Spinal posture, mobility, and position sense in adolescents with chest wall deformities: a comparison of pectus excavatum, pectus carinatum and healthy peers.

Oguzhan Mete, Hakan Işik, Cansu Şahbaz Pirinççi, Mustafa Ertuğrul Yaşa, Ersin Sapmaz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Nuss and reverse Nuss procedure paradox: divergent outcomes in scoliosis risk for pectus excavatum and pectus carinatum patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. An overview of pectus deformities and rehabilitation approaches.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oguzhan MeteCardiopulmonary Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, Gülhane Faculty of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey. fztoguzhanmete06@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6585-7617
Hakan IşikDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7602-4434
Cansu Şahbaz PirinççiCardiopulmonary Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, Gülhane Faculty of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3921-0721
Mustafa Ertuğrul YaşaCardiopulmonary Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, Gülhane Faculty of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7796-2588
Ersin SapmazDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1252-2714

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study aimed to compare spinal posture, mobility, and position sense in adolescents with pectus excavatum (PE), pectus carinatum (PC), and healthy control (HC).

methods22 with PE, 22 with PC, and 21 HC were included in the study. The spinal posture (thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, thoracic, lumbar, pelvic lateral tilt angles) and mobility (thoracic, lumbar, hip/sacral, and overall, in the sagittal and frontal plane) with the spinal mouse, and spinal position sense (repositing errors) with the inclinometer were assessed.

resultsThe thoracic kyphosis angle of PE and PC was higher than in HC (p < 0.001; p = 0.001). Hip/sacral mobility in the sagittal plane was lower in the PE and PC than control, respectively (p < 0.001; p < 0.001). Overall sagittal spinal mobility (p:0.007) and hip/sacral mobility in the frontal plane (p:0.002) were lower in the PC than in HC. Overall frontal spinal mobility was lower in the PE and PC than in HC (p:0.002; p:0.014). The PE and PC repositing errors were higher (p < 0.001; p:0.014).

conclusionThe study found that adolescents with PE and PC had decreased spinal mobility, spinal alignment disorders, and a decline in spinal position sense. It is important not to overlook the spine during physical examinations of adolescents with chest wall deformities. In clinical practice, we suggest that adolescents with chest deformities should undergo a spine evaluation and be referred for physical therapy to manage spinal disorders.

Indexed as

Funnel ChestPectus CarinatumPostureAdolescentCase-Control StudiesChildFemaleHumansMaleProprioceptionSpineThoracic WallPectus carinatumPectus excavatumPostureProprioceptionSpineThoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID38970642
PMCPMC11227458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.