Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38970614›Full record

ReviewCytotherapy2024

Bioprocessing considerations for generation of iPSCs intended for clinical application: perspectives from the ISCT Emerging Regenerative Medicine Technology working group.

Hannah W Song, Jennifer N Solomon, Fernanda Masri, Amanda Mack, Nisha Durand, Emmanuelle Cameau, Noushin Dianat, Arwen Hunter, Steve Oh, Brianna Schoen and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cytotherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Hannah W SongCenter for Cellular Engineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jennifer N SolomonSTEMCELL Technologies Inc, Vancouver, Canada.
Fernanda MasriCell and Gene Therapy Catapult, London, UK.
Amanda MackDark Horse Consulting, Denver, CO, USA.
Nisha DurandBioCytics Inc, Huntersville, NC, USA.
Emmanuelle CameauCytiva, Pall Life Sciences 24-26 avenue de Winchester, CS5005, 78100 St. Germain-en-Laye, France.
Noushin DianatSartorius Stedim, Aubagne, France.
Arwen HunterSTEMCELL Technologies Inc, Vancouver, Canada.
Steve OhCellvec Pte. Ltd. 100 Pasir Panjang, #04-01/02, Singapore 118518 Singapore.
Brianna SchoenCharles River Laboratories Cell Solutions, Inc. 8500 Balboa Blvd. Suite 230 Northridge, CA 91320, USA.
Matthew MarshMinaris Regenerative Medicine, Allendale, NJ, USA.
Christopher BraveryConsulting on Advanced Biologicals Ltd, London, UK.
Cenk SumenMaxCyte, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA.
Dominic ClarkeOrange County Bio, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA.
Kapil BhartiNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethsda, MD, USA.
Julie G AllicksonCenter for Regenerative Biotherapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Uma LakshmipathyPharma Services, Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Diego, CA, USA. Electronic address: Uma.Lakshmipathy@thermofisher.com.

Funding

Developing autologous iPSC-RPE based IND for AMD patientsZIAEY000542 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI BHARTI, KAPIL · 2014 to 2025
$24.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA EY000542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approval of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) for the manufacture of cell therapies to support clinical trials is now becoming realized after 20 years of research and development. In 2022 the International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy (ISCT) established a Working Group on Emerging Regenerative Medicine Technologies, an area in which iPSCs-derived technologies are expected to play a key role. In this article, the Working Group surveys the steps that an end user should consider when generating iPSCs that are stable, well-characterised, pluripotent, and suitable for making differentiated cell types for allogeneic or autologous cell therapies. The objective is to provide the reader with a holistic view of how to achieve high-quality iPSCs from selection of the starting material through to cell banking. Key considerations include: (i) intellectual property licenses; (ii) selection of the raw materials and cell sources for creating iPSC intermediates and master cell banks; (iii) regulatory considerations for reprogramming methods; (iv) options for expansion in 2D vs. 3D cultures; and (v) available technologies and equipment for harvesting, washing, concentration, filling, cryopreservation, and storage. Some key process limitations are highlighted to help drive further improvement and innovation, and includes recommendations to close and automate current open and manual processes.

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsRegenerative MedicineCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingCryopreservationHumanscell manufacturinginduced pluripotent stem cellsreprogramming

Identifiers

PMID38970614
PMCPMC12288090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.