Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38970585›Full record

ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular interventions2024

Predicting Successful Chronic Total Occlusion Crossing With Primary Antegrade Wiring Using Machine Learning.

Athanasios Rempakos, Michaella Alexandrou, Deniz Mutlu, Arun Kalyanasundaram, Luiz F Ybarra, Rodrigo Bagur, James W Choi, Paul Poommipanit, Jaikirshan J Khatri, Laura Young and 24 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02061436 (Multicenter Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion Interventions), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02061436 recruitingnot on this map

Multicenter Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion Interventions

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMinneapolis Heart Institute FoundationRan2012 to 2030Enrolled2,000ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

Athanasios RempakosMinneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Michaella AlexandrouMinneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Deniz MutluMinneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Arun KalyanasundaramThe Promed Hospital, Chennai, India.
Luiz F YbarraLondon Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Rodrigo BagurLondon Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
James W ChoiTexas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Paul PoommipanitUniversity Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Jaikirshan J KhatriCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Laura YoungCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Rhian DaviesWellSpan York Hospital, York, Pennsylvania, USA.
Stewart BentonWellSpan York Hospital, York, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sevket GorguluBiruni University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.
Farouc A JafferMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Raj ChandwaneyOklahoma Heart Institute, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Wissam JaberEmory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Stephane RinfretEmory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
William NicholsonEmory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Lorenzo AzzaliniDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kathleen E KearneyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Khaldoon AlaswadHenry Ford Cardiovascular Division, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Mir B BasirHenry Ford Cardiovascular Division, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Oleg KrestyaninovMeshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Dmitrii KhelimskiiMeshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Nidal Abi-RafehNorth Oaks Health System, Hammond, Louisiana, USA.
Ahmed ElguindyAswan Heart Center, Magdi Yacoub Foundation, Cairo, Egypt.
Omer GoktekinMemorial Bahcelievler Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nazif AygulSelcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Bavana V RanganMinneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Olga C MastrodemosMinneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Ahmed Al-OgailiMinneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Yader SandovalMinneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
M Nicholas BurkeMinneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Emmanouil S BrilakisMinneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. Electronic address: esbrilakis@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited data on predicting successful chronic total occlusion crossing using primary antegrade wiring (AW).

objectivesThe aim of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) prognostic model for successful chronic total occlusion crossing using primary AW.

methodsWe used data from 12,136 primary AW cases performed between 2012 and 2023 at 48 centers in the PROGRESS CTO registry (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention; NCT02061436) to develop 5 ML models. Hyperparameter tuning was performed for the model with the best performance, and the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) explainer was implemented to estimate feature importance.

resultsPrimary AW was successful in 6,965 cases (57.4%). Extreme gradient boosting was the best performing ML model with an average area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.775 (± 0.010). After hyperparameter tuning, the average area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of the extreme gradient boosting model was 0.782 in the training set and 0.780 in the testing set. Among the factors examined, occlusion length had the most significant impact on predicting successful primary AW crossing followed by blunt/no stump, presence of interventional collaterals, vessel diameter, and proximal cap ambiguity. In contrast, aorto-ostial lesion location had the least impact on the outcome. A web-based application for predicting successful primary AW wiring crossing is available online (PROGRESS-CTO website) (https://www.progresscto.org/predict-aw-success).

conclusionsWe developed an ML model with 14 features and high predictive capacity for successful primary AW in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.

Indexed as

Coronary OcclusionMachine LearningPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsRegistriesAgedChronic DiseaseDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment Outcomechronic total occlusioncoronary artery diseasemachine learningpercutaneous coronary interventionprimary antegrade wiring

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.