Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38970395›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2024

Variant patterns of electrical activation and recovery in normal human hearts revealed by noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging.

Job Stoks, Kiran Haresh Kumar Patel, Bianca van Rees, Uyen Chau Nguyen, Casper Mihl, Peter M Deissler, Rachel M A Ter Bekke, Ralf Peeters, Johan Vijgen, Paul Dendale and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Job StoksDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8881-5498
Kiran Haresh Kumar PatelNational Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7499-0815
Bianca van ReesDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1388-3039
Uyen Chau NguyenDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4836-2946
Casper MihlDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1348-6970
Peter M DeisslerDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4992-914X
Rachel M A Ter BekkeDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4278-0132
Ralf PeetersDepartment of Advanced Computing Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9973-8181
Johan VijgenFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, UHasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4928-4836
Paul DendaleFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, UHasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0821-4559
Fu Siong NgNational Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8681-4368
Matthijs J M CluitmansDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3456-7668
Paul G A VoldersDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2652-1598

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/F/22/110078Dutch Heart Foundation 2021T016German Academic Scholarship FoundationGerman Research Foundation 529532291Hasselt University and Maastricht University Medical Center BOF17DOCMA15Health Foundation LimburgMaastricht University 2015T61Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research 0915016181013Special Research FundWalter Benjamin Programme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAlthough electrical activity of the normal human heart is well characterized by the electrocardiogram, detailed insights into within-subject and between-subject variations of ventricular activation and recovery by noninvasive electroanatomic mapping are lacking. We characterized human epicardial activation and recovery within and between normal subjects using non-invasive electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) as a basis to better understand pathology. METHODS AND

resultsEpicardial activation and recovery were assessed by ECGI in 22 normal subjects, 4 subjects with bundle branch block (BBB) and 4 with long-QT syndrome (LQTS). We compared characteristics between the ventricles [left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV)], sexes, and age groups (<50/≥50years). Pearson's correlation coefficient (CC) was used for within-subject and between-subject comparisons. Age of normal subjects averaged 49 ± 14 years, 6/22 were male, and no structural/electrical heart disease was present. The average activation time was longer in LV than in RV, but not different by sex or age. Electrical recovery was similar for the ventricles, but started earlier and was on average shorter in males. Median CCs of between-subject comparisons of the ECG signals, activation, and recovery patterns were 0.61, 0.32, and 0.19, respectively. Within-subject beat-to-beat comparisons yielded higher CCs (0.98, 0.89, and 0.82, respectively). Activation and/or recovery patterns of patients with BBB or LQTS contrasted significantly with those found in the normal population.

conclusionActivation and recovery patterns vary profoundly between normal subjects, but are stable individually beat to beat, with a male preponderance to shorter recovery. Individual characterization by ECGI at baseline serves as reference to better understand the emergence, progression, and treatment of electrical heart disease.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsBundle-Branch BlockElectrocardiographyLong QT SyndromeAdultAgedAge FactorsCase-Control StudiesEpicardial MappingFemaleHeart RateHeart VentriclesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsDynamicsECGIElectrophysiologyNormalVariabilityVentricles

Identifiers

PMID38970395
PMCPMC11226755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.