ArticleSystematic biology2024
Expectation-Maximization enables Phylogenetic Dating under a Categorical Rate Model.
Article in Systematic biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Triplet-based species tree estimation: Sensitivity to gene tree rooting (or lack thereof).PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Species Tree Branch Length Estimation despite Incomplete Lineage Sorting, Duplication, and Loss.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Maximum likelihood phylogeographic inference of cell motility and cell division from spatial lineage tracing data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dating phylogenetic trees to obtain branch lengths in time units is essential for many downstream applications but has remained challenging. Dating requires inferring substitution rates that can change across the tree. While we can assume to have information about a small subset of nodes from the fossil record or sampling times (for fast-evolving organisms), inferring the ages of the other nodes essentially requires extrapolation and interpolation. Assuming a distribution of branch rates, we can formulate dating as a constrained maximum likelihood (ML) estimation problem. While ML dating methods exist, their accuracy degrades in the face of model misspecification, where the assumed parametric statistical distribution of branch rates vastly differs from the true distribution. Notably, most existing methods assume rigid, often unimodal, branch rate distributions. A second challenge is that the likelihood function involves an integral over the continuous domain of the rates, often leading to difficult non-convex optimization problems. To tackle both challenges, we propose a new method called Molecular Dating using Categorical-models (MD-Cat). MD-Cat uses a categorical model of rates inspired by non-parametric statistics and can approximate a large family of models by discretizing the rate distribution into k categories. Under this model, we can use the Expectation-Maximization algorithm to co-estimate rate categories and branch lengths in time units. Our model has fewer assumptions about the true distribution of branch rates than parametric models such as Gamma or LogNormal distribution. Our results on two simulated and real datasets of Angiosperms and HIV and a wide selection of rate distributions show that MD-Cat is often more accurate than the alternatives, especially on datasets with exponential or multimodal rate distributions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.