Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38970327›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of infectious diseases2025

Phase 3 Study Assessing Lot-to-Lot Consistency of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion Protein F3 Vaccine and Its Immune Response, Safety, and Reactogenicity When Co-administered With Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine.

Nnenna Chime, Bruno Anspach, Vishal Jain, Outi Laajalahti, Thierry Ollinger, Deborah Yaplee, Joon Hyung Kim

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05045144 (A Phase III, Randomized, Multi-country Study to Evaluate the Lot-to-lot Consistency of GSK's Investigational RSV Maternal Vaccine and the Immune Response, Safety and Reactogenicity of RSV Maternal Vaccine When Co-administered With GSK's Quadrivalent Influenza D-QIV Vaccine in Healthy Non-pregnant Women 18-49 Years of Age.), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05045144 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Randomized, Multi-country Study to Evaluate the Lot-to-lot Consistency of GSK's Investigational RSV Maternal Vaccine and the Immune Response, Safety and Reactogenicity of RSV Maternal Vaccine When Co-administered With GSK's Quadrivalent Influenza D-QIV Vaccine in Healthy Non-pregnant Women 18-49 Years of Age.

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2021 to 2022Enrolled1,586ConditionsRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsArmsRSVPreF3(120 μg), Flu Quadrivalent influenza vaccine (15 μg HA), Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nnenna ChimeGSK, Rockville, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-7380-2114
Bruno AnspachGSK, Rockville, Maryland.
Vishal JainGSK, Rockville, Maryland.
Outi LaajalahtiFinnish Vaccine Research, Seinäjoki, Finland.
Thierry OllingerGSK, Wavre, Belgium.
Deborah YapleeGSK, Rockville, Maryland.
Joon Hyung KimGSK, Rockville, Maryland.

Funding

GSK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA single-dose investigational respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine, RSV prefusion protein F3 (RSVPreF3), was co-administered with a single-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (FLU-D-QIV) in a phase 3, randomized, controlled, multicenter study in healthy, nonpregnant women aged 18-49 years.

methodsThe study was observer-blind to evaluate the lot-to-lot consistency of RSVPreF3, and single-blind to evaluate the immune response, safety, and reactogenicity of RSVPreF3 co-administered with FLU-D-QIV.

resultsA total of 1415 participants were included in the per-protocol set. There was a robust immune response at day 31 across each of the 3 RSVPreF3 vaccine lots; adjusted geometric mean concentration ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 1.01 (.91-1.12), 0.93 (.84-1.03), and 0.92 (.83-1.02) for RSV1/RSV2, RSV1/RSV3, and RSV2/RSV3, respectively. For FLU-D-QIV co-administered with RSVPreF3, versus FLU-D-QIV alone at day 31, noninferiority was satisfied for 3 of 4 strains assessed, with the lower limit of the 95% CI for geometric mean ratio >0.67.

conclusionsImmunogenic consistency was demonstrated for 3 separate lots of RSVPreF3. Immunogenic noninferiority was demonstrated when comparing FLU-D-QIV administered alone, versus co-administered with RSVPreF3, for 3 strains of FLU-D-QIV. Co-administration was well tolerated, and both vaccines had clinically acceptable safety and reactogenicity profiles. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT05045144; EudraCT 2021-000357-26.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesRespiratory Syncytial Virus, HumanRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsRespiratory Syncytial Virus VaccinesAdolescentAdultAntibodies, ViralFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultAntibodies, ViralInfluenza VaccinesRespiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccinesinfluenza virusquadrivalent influenza vaccinerespiratory syncytial virusRSVPreF3 vaccinevaccine co-administration

Identifiers

PMID38970327
PMCPMC11793055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.