Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38970137›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2024

Diagnosis of pediatric central nervous system tumors using methylation profiling of cfDNA from cerebrospinal fluid.

Lotte Cornelli, Ruben Van Paemel, Maísa R Ferro Dos Santos, Sofie Roelandt, Leen Willems, Jelle Vandersteene, Edward Baert, Liselot M Mus, Nadine Van Roy, Bram De Wilde and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lotte CornelliDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ruben Van PaemelDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Maísa R Ferro Dos SantosDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Sofie RoelandtDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Leen WillemsDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Jelle VandersteeneDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Edward BaertDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Liselot M MusDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Nadine Van RoyDepartment of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Bram De Wilde *Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Katleen De Preter *Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. katleen.depreter@ugent.be.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1S45323NKom op tegen Kanker STI.VLK.2019.0009.01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric central nervous system tumors remain challenging to diagnose. Imaging approaches do not provide sufficient detail to discriminate between different tumor types, while the histopathological examination of tumor tissue shows high inter-observer variability. Recent studies have demonstrated the accurate classification of central nervous system tumors based on the DNA methylation profile of a tumor biopsy. However, a brain biopsy holds significant risk of bleeding and damaging the surrounding tissues. Liquid biopsy approaches analyzing circulating tumor DNA show high potential as an alternative and less invasive tool to study the DNA methylation pattern of tumors. Here, we explore the potential of classifying pediatric brain tumors based on methylation profiling of the circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). For this proof-of-concept study, we collected cerebrospinal fluid samples from 19 pediatric brain cancer patients via a ventricular drain placed for reasons of increased intracranial pressure. Analyses on the cfDNA showed high variability of cfDNA quantities across patients ranging from levels below the limit of quantification to 40 ng cfDNA per milliliter of CSF. Classification based on methylation profiling of cfDNA from CSF was correct for 7 out of 20 samples in our cohort. Accurate results were mostly observed in samples of high quality, more specifically those with limited high molecular weight DNA contamination. Interestingly, we show that centrifugation of the CSF prior to processing increases the fraction of fragmented cfDNA to high molecular weight DNA. In addition, classification was mostly correct for samples with high tumoral cfDNA fraction as estimated by computational deconvolution (> 40%). In summary, analysis of cfDNA in the CSF shows potential as a tool for diagnosing pediatric nervous system tumors especially in patients with high levels of tumoral cfDNA in the CSF. Further optimization of the collection procedure, experimental workflow and bioinformatic approach is required to also allow classification for patients with low tumoral fractions in the CSF.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsCirculating Tumor DNADNA MethylationAdolescentBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantLiquid BiopsyMaleProof of Concept StudyBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNACentral nervous system tumorCerebrospinal fluidDNA methylationLiquid biopsyPediatric oncologyPrecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID38970137
PMCPMC11225235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.