Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38970129›Full record

ArticleCardio-oncology (London, England)2024

Prognostic significance of troponin in patients with malignancy (NIHR Health Informatics Collaborative TROP-MALIGNANCY study).

Nathan A Samuel, Alistair Roddick, Ben Glampson, Abdulrahim Mulla, Jim Davies, Dimitri Papadimitriou, Vasileios Panoulas, Erik Mayer, Kerrie Woods, Anoop D Shah and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Current and novel biomarkers in cardiogenic shock.European journal of heart failure · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Nathan A SamuelNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, U.K.
Alistair RoddickNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, U.K.
Ben GlampsonNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, U.K.
Abdulrahim MullaNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, U.K.
Jim DaviesNIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford and Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, U.K.
Dimitri PapadimitriouNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, U.K.
Vasileios PanoulasNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, U.K.
Erik MayerNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, U.K.
Kerrie WoodsNIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford and Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, U.K.
Anoop D ShahHospitals Biomedical Research Centre, NIHR University College London, University College London and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
Sanjay GautamaNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, U.K.
Paul ElliottNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, U.K.
Harry HemmingwayHospitals Biomedical Research Centre, NIHR University College London, University College London and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
Bryan WilliamsHospitals Biomedical Research Centre, NIHR University College London, University College London and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
Folkert W AsselbergsHospitals Biomedical Research Centre, NIHR University College London, University College London and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
Narbeh MelikianNIHR King's Biomedical Research Centre, King's College London and King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
Rajesh KharbandaNIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford and Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, U.K.
Ajay M ShahNIHR King's Biomedical Research Centre, King's College London and King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
Divaka PereraNIHR King's Biomedical Research Centre, King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
Riyaz S PatelHospitals Biomedical Research Centre, NIHR University College London, University College London and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, U.K.
Keith M ChannonNIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford and Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, U.K.
Jamil MayetNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, U.K.. j.mayet@imperial.ac.uk.
Anoop S V ShahNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, U.K.
Amit KauraNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, Imperial College London and Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, U.K.

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/1999001/11735British Heart Foundation FS/14/76/30933British Heart Foundation FS/19/17/34172British Heart Foundation FS/20/18/34972British Heart Foundation FS/CRA/22/23036British Heart Foundation RE/18/4/34215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac troponin is commonly raised in patients presenting with malignancy. The prognostic significance of raised troponin in these patients is unclear.

objectivesWe sought to investigate the relation between troponin and mortality in a large, well characterised cohort of patients with a routinely measured troponin and a primary diagnosis of malignancy.

methodsWe used the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Informatics Collaborative data of 5571 patients, who had troponin levels measured at 5 UK cardiac centres between 2010 and 2017 and had a primary diagnosis of malignancy. Patients were classified into solid tumour or haematological malignancy subgroups. Peak troponin levels were standardised as a multiple of each laboratory's 99th -percentile upper limit of normal (xULN).

results4649 patients were diagnosed with solid tumours and 922 patients with haematological malignancies. Raised troponin was an independent predictor of mortality in all patients (Troponin > 10 vs. <1 adjusted HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.73 to 2.34), in solid tumours (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.19), and in haematological malignancy (HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.99 to 3.72). There was a significant trend in increasing mortality risk across troponin categories in all three subgroups (p < 0.001).

conclusionRaised troponin level is associated with increased mortality in patients with a primary diagnosis of malignancy regardless of cancer subtype. Mortality risk is stable for patients with a troponin level below the ULN but increases as troponin level increases above the ULN in the absence of acute coronary syndrome.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCancerCardio-oncologyMalignancyMortalityTroponin

Identifiers

PMID38970129
PMCPMC11225146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.