Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38970126›Full record

Trial reportMicrobiome2024

Fecal microbiota transplantation alters gut phage communities in a clinical trial for obesity.

Michele Zuppi, Tommi Vatanen, Brooke C Wilson, Evgeniia Golovina, Theo Portlock, Wayne S Cutfield, Mark H Vickers, Justin M O'Sullivan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Microbiome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michele ZuppiLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Tommi VatanenLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. tommi.vatanen@helsinki.fi.
Brooke C WilsonLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Evgeniia GolovinaLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Theo PortlockLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Wayne S CutfieldLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Mark H VickersLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Justin M O'SullivanLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. justin.osullivan@auckland.ac.nz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a therapeutic intervention used to treat diseases associated with the gut microbiome. In the human gut microbiome, phages have been implicated in influencing human health, with successful engraftment of donor phages correlated with FMT treatment efficacy. The impact that gastrointestinal phages exert on human health has primarily been connected to their ability to modulate the bacterial communities in the gut. Nonetheless, how FMT affects recipients' phage populations, and in turn, how this influences the gut environment, is not yet fully understood. In this study, we investigated the effects of FMT on the phageome composition of participants within the Gut Bugs Trial (GBT), a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial that investigated the efficacy of FMT in treating obesity and comorbidities in adolescents. Stool samples collected from donors at the time of treatment and recipients at four time points (i.e., baseline and 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 26 weeks post-intervention), underwent shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Phage sequences were identified and characterized in silico to examine evidence of phage engraftment and to assess the extent of FMT-induced alterations in the recipients' phageome composition.

resultsDonor phages engrafted stably in recipients following FMT, composing a significant proportion of their phageome for the entire course of the study (33.8 ± 1.2% in females and 33.9 ± 3.7% in males). Phage engraftment varied between donors and donor engraftment efficacy was positively correlated with their phageome alpha diversity. FMT caused a shift in recipients' phageome toward the donors' composition and increased phageome alpha diversity and variability over time.

conclusionsFMT significantly altered recipients' phage and, overall, microbial populations. The increase in microbial diversity and variability is consistent with a shift in microbial population dynamics. This proposes that phages play a critical role in modulating the gut environment and suggests novel approaches to understanding the efficacy of FMT in altering the recipient's microbiome.

trial registrationThe Gut Bugs Trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTR N12615001351505). Trial protocol: the trial protocol is available at https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/4/e026174 . Video Abstract.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesFecal Microbiota TransplantationFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeObesityAdolescentBacteriaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMetagenomicsTreatment OutcomeDonor microbiome diversityFecal microbiota transplantation (FMT)Microbial engraftmentMicrobial population dynamicsPhageome composition

Identifiers

PMID38970126
PMCPMC11227244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.