Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38969998›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2024

Integrating virtual patients into undergraduate health professions curricula: a framework synthesis of stakeholders' opinions based on a systematic literature review.

Joanna Fąferek, Pierre-Louis Cariou, Inga Hege, Anja Mayer, Luc Morin, Daloha Rodriguez-Molina, Bernardo Sousa-Pinto, Andrzej A Kononowicz

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joanna FąferekCenter for Innovative Medical Education, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Medyczna 7, Krakow, 30-688, Poland. joanna.faferek@uj.edu.pl.
Pierre-Louis CariouFaculty of Medicine, Paris Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, 94270, France.
Inga HegeParacelsus Medical University, Prof.-Ernst-Nathan-Str. 1, 90419, Nürnberg, Germany.
Anja MayerMedical Education Sciences, University of Augsburg, 86159, Augsburg, Germany.
Luc MorinFaculty of Medicine, Paris Saclay University, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, 94270, France.
Daloha Rodriguez-MolinaInstitute and Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, LMU University Hospital, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Bernardo Sousa-PintoDepartment of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Andrzej A KononowiczDepartment of Bioinformatics and Telemedicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Medyczna 7, Krakow, 30-688, Poland. andrzej.kononowicz@uj.edu.pl.

Funding

Erasmus+ 2020-1-DE01-KA226-005754Jagiellonian University Medical College N41/DBS/001125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVirtual patients (VPs) are widely used in health professions education. When they are well integrated into curricula, they are considered to be more effective than loosely coupled add-ons. However, it is unclear what constitutes their successful integration. The aim of this study was to identify and synthesise the themes found in the literature that stakeholders perceive as important for successful implementation of VPs in curricula.

methodsWe searched five databases from 2000 to September 25, 2023. We included qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods and descriptive case studies that defined, identified, explored, or evaluated a set of factors that, in the perception of students, teachers, course directors and researchers, were crucial for VP implementation. We excluded effectiveness studies that did not consider implementation characteristics, and studies that focused on VP design factors. We included English-language full-text reports and excluded conference abstracts, short opinion papers and editorials. Synthesis of results was performed using the framework synthesis method with Kern's six-step model as the initial framework. We appraised the quality of the studies using the QuADS tool.

resultsOur search yielded a total of 4808 items, from which 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. We identified 14 themes that formed an integration framework. The themes were: goal in the curriculum; phase of the curriculum when to implement VPs; effective use of resources; VP alignment with curricular learning objectives; prioritisation of use; relation to other learning modalities; learning activities around VPs; time allocation; group setting; presence mode; VPs orientation for students and faculty; technical infrastructure; quality assurance, maintenance, and sustainability; assessment of VP learning outcomes and learning analytics. We investigated the occurrence of themes across studies to demonstrate the relevance of the framework. The quality of the studies did not influence the coverage of the themes.

conclusionsThe resulting framework can be used to structure plans and discussions around implementation of VPs in curricula. It has already been used to organise the curriculum implementation guidelines of a European project. We expect it will direct further research to deepen our knowledge on individual integration themes.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHealth OccupationsHumansPatient SimulationStakeholder ParticipationCurriculum developmentFramework synthesisSystematic reviewVirtual patients

Identifiers

PMID38969998
PMCPMC11225252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.