Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38969907›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2024

Synchronous citizen science with dogs.

Madeline H Pelgrim, Zachary Tidd, Molly Byrne, Angie M Johnston, Daphna Buchsbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Madeline H PelgrimDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, & Psychological Sciences, Brown University, 190 Thayer St. , Providence, RI, 02912, USA. mpelgrim@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4127-2884
Zachary TiddDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
Molly ByrneDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
Angie M JohnstonDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
Daphna BuchsbaumDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, & Psychological Sciences, Brown University, 190 Thayer St. , Providence, RI, 02912, USA.

Funding

Training Program for Interactionist Cognitive Neuroscience (ICoN)T32MH115895 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL J. FRANK, STEPHANIE Ruggiano JONES · 2019 to 2026
$1.8M
National Science Foundation 2051064NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH115895NIMH NIH HHS T32MH115895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Citizen science approaches have grown in popularity over the years, partly due to their ability to reach a wider audience and produce more generalizable samples. In dogs, these studies, though, have been limited in their controls over materials or experimental protocols, with guardians typically reporting results without researcher supervision. Over two studies, we explored and validated a synchronous citizen science approach. We had dog guardians act as experimenters while being supervised by a researcher over Zoom. In study 1, we demonstrated that synchronous citizen science produced equivalent levels of performance to in-lab designs in a choice task. Consistent with past in-lab research, dogs selected a treat (vs. an empty plate) in a two-alternative forced-choice task. In study 2, we showed that Zoom methods are also appropriate for studies utilizing looking time measures. We explored dogs' looking behaviors when a bag of treats was placed in an unreachable location, and dogs' guardians were either attentive or inattentive while dogs attempted to retrieve the treats. Consistent with past work, dogs in the attentive condition looked at their guardian for longer periods and had a shorter latency to first look than dogs in the inattentive condition. Overall, we have demonstrated that synchronous citizen science studies with dogs are feasible and produce valid results consistent with those found in a typical lab setting.

Indexed as

Citizen ScienceAnimalsBehavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorDogsFemaleMaleCanine CognitionCitizen ScienceDecision MakingDomestic DogSocial Cognition

Identifiers

PMID38969907
PMCPMC11226520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.