Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38969866›Full record

Observational studyBritish journal of cancer2024

Cancer cell extravasation requires

Olivia R Grafinger, John J Hayward, Ying Meng, Jennifer Geddes-McAlister, Yan Li, Sara Mar, Minzhi Sheng, Boyang Su, Gobi Thillainadesan, Nir Lipsman and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in British journal of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04608357 (Integrated Patient Avatars for Guiding Systemic Therapy Treatments), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04608357 recruitingnot on this map

Integrated Patient Avatars for Guiding Systemic Therapy Treatments: "Intuition-Free" Decisions in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRan2021 to 2027Enrolled25ConditionsBreast Cancer, Breast Neoplasms, Metastatic Breast Cancer, Cancer, BreastArmsNeedle Core Biopsies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Olivia R GrafingerBiological Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8082-1594
John J HaywardDepartment of Chemistry, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada.
Ying MengHarquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jennifer Geddes-McAlisterDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Yan LiBiological Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sara MarBiological Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Minzhi ShengBiological Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5668-1314
Boyang SuBiological Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gobi ThillainadesanBiological Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nir LipsmanHarquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Marc G CoppolinoDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
John F TrantDepartment of Chemistry, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada.
Katarzyna J JerzakDepartment of Medical Biophysics, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3995-0308
Hon S LeongBiological Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada. hon.leong@sri.utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7801-1402

Funding

Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology) 05199Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology) 06338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvadopodia facilitate cancer cell extravasation, but the molecular mechanism whereby invadopodia-specific proteases such as MT1-MMP are called to invadopodia is unclear.

methodsMass spectrometry and immunoprecipitation were used to identify interactors of MT1-MMP in metastatic breast cancer cells. After identification, siRNA and small molecule inhibitors were used to assess the effect these interactors had on cellular invasiveness. The chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model was used to assess extravasation and invadopodia formation in vivo.

resultsIn metastatic breast cancer cells, MT1-MMP was found to associate with plectin, a cytolinker and scaffolding protein. Complex formation between plectin and MT1-MMP launches invadopodia formation, a subtype we termed

conclusionsAnti-metastasis therapeutic approaches that target invadopodia are possible by disrupting interactions between MT1-MMP and CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04608357.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMatrix Metalloproteinase 14Neoplasm InvasivenessPodosomesAnimalsCell Line, TumorCell MovementChick EmbryoChorioallantoic MembraneFemaleHumansPlectinPrimary Cell CultureProspective StudiesRNA, Small InterferingMatrix Metalloproteinase 14MMP14 protein, humanPlectinRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID38969866
PMCPMC11369281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.