ArticleBiochemical genetics2025
The Relationship Between GAPDH Gene Polymorphism and Risk of Acute Coronary Syndrome in South Indians with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Article in Biochemical genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) is one of the regulators of carbonyl stress, a pathogenic mechanism for diabetic complications like acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the study aimed to investigate the relationship between GAPDH gene polymorphism, GAPDH activity in red blood cell (RBC), methylglyoxal (MG) levels in plasma and ACS risk in South Indians with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study comprised 150 T2DM with ACS as cases and 150 T2DM without ACS as controls. The GAPDH rs1136666, rs1060620 and rs1060619 gene polymorphisms were identified by TaqMan probe assays. The RBC GAPDH activity and plasma MG levels were estimated. Cases had significantly higher plasma MG levels and lower RBC GAPDH activity than controls (P < 0.001). The distribution of rs1060620 or rs1060619 alleles and genotypes significantly differed between groups. The rs1060620 AG (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.33-0.92; P = 0.022) or rs1060619 CT (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.31-0.83; P = 0.007) genotype was associated with reduced ACS risk, confirmed in the over-dominant genetic model. Haplotype analyses revealed that the GAT and CGC haplotypes were associated with increased (OR 28.37; 95% CI 3.82-210.49; P = 8.51 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
38969817What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.