Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38969812›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2024

Comparative genome-wide analysis of circular RNAs in Brassica napus L.: target-site versus non-target-site resistance to herbicide stress.

Yue Guo, Ting Wang, Xinyu Lu, Weilong Li, Xinlei Lv, Qi Peng, Jiefu Zhang, Jianqin Gao, Maolong Hu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exploring the CeRNA landscape in plants: advances, methods, and challenges.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yue GuoInstitute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing Subcenter, National Center of Oil Crops Improvement, Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agrobiology, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Ting WangInstitute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing Subcenter, National Center of Oil Crops Improvement, Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agrobiology, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Xinyu LuInstitute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing Subcenter, National Center of Oil Crops Improvement, Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agrobiology, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Weilong LiInstitute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing Subcenter, National Center of Oil Crops Improvement, Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agrobiology, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Xinlei LvInstitute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing Subcenter, National Center of Oil Crops Improvement, Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agrobiology, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Qi PengInstitute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing Subcenter, National Center of Oil Crops Improvement, Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agrobiology, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Jiefu ZhangInstitute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing Subcenter, National Center of Oil Crops Improvement, Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agrobiology, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Jianqin GaoInstitute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing Subcenter, National Center of Oil Crops Improvement, Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agrobiology, Nanjing, 210014, China.
Maolong HuInstitute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing Subcenter, National Center of Oil Crops Improvement, Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed (Nanjing), Ministry of Agriculture, Provincial Key Laboratory of Agrobiology, Nanjing, 210014, China. humolon@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0003-0643

Funding

Agriculture Research System of China CARS-12Jiangsu Provincial Agricultural Science and Technology Independent Innovation Fund CX(22)3084National Natural Science Foundation of China 31901503Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20190267Science and Technology Innovation 2030 Major Program 2023ZD0404203Special Fund for Scientific Innovation Strategy-Construction of High-level Academy of Agriculture Science HSXT3015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circular RNAs (circRNAs), a class of non-coding RNA molecules, are recognized for their unique functions; however, their responses to herbicide stress in Brassica napus remain unclear. In this study, the role of circRNAs in response to herbicide treatment was investigated in two rapeseed cultivars: MH33, which confers non-target-site resistance (NTSR), and EM28, which exhibits target-site resistance (TSR). The genome-wide circRNA profiles of herbicide-stressed and non-stressed seedlings were analyzed. The findings indicate that NTSR seedlings exhibited a greater abundance of circRNAs, shorter lengths of circRNAs and their parent genes, and more diverse functions of parent genes compared with TSR seedlings. Compared to normal-growth plants, the herbicide-stressed group exhibited similar trends in the number of circRNAs, functions of parent genes, and differentially expressed circRNAs as observed in NTSR seedlings. In addition, a greater number of circRNAs that function as competing microRNA (miRNA) sponges were identified in the herbicide stress and NTSR groups compared to the normal-growth and TSR groups, respectively. The differentially expressed circRNAs were validated by qPCR. The differntially expressed circRNA-miRNA networks were predicted, and the mRNAs targeted by these miRNAs were annotated. Our results suggest that circRNAs play a crucial role in responding to herbicide stress, exhibiting distinct responses between NTSR and TSR in rapeseed. These findings offer valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying herbicide resistance in rapeseed.

Indexed as

Brassica napusGene Expression Regulation, PlantHerbicide ResistanceHerbicidesRNA, CircularRNA, PlantGenome, PlantMicroRNAsSeedlingsStress, PhysiologicalHerbicidesMicroRNAsRNA, CircularRNA, Plant

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.