ArticleScientific reports2024
AI models predicting breast cancer distant metastasis using LightGBM with clinical blood markers and ultrasound maximum diameter.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Pathology for Preoperative Lymphovascular Invasion and Metastatic Risk Prediction in Breast Cancer: Bridging the Biopsy-Resection Gap.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of Underlying Liver Disease on the Risk and Prognostic Factors of Breast Cancer Liver Metastases: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Validity and applicability of machine learning models for systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosis.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
- From Feasibility to Individualization: Surgery for Breast Cancer Liver and Lung Metastases.Cancers · 2026Review
- Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: Current Understanding and Future Directions.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Deep learning-radiomics-SUVmax integration fromFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Models Utilizing Oxidative Stress Biomarkers for Breast Cancer Prediction: Efficacy and Limitations in Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis Detection.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Models for Cancer Research: A Narrative Review of Bulk RNA-Seq Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Machine learning-based prognosis prediction for serous ovarian cancer using the SEER database and data from a single center in China.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Regulation of metastatic organotropism.Trends in cancer · 2025Review
- Predicting the axillary lymph node tumor burden in breast cancer patients using ultrasonic radiomics nomogram model.PloS one · 2025Article
- The functions of apolipoproteins and lipoproteins in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer metastasis significantly impacts women's health globally. This study aimed to construct predictive models using clinical blood markers and ultrasound data to predict distant metastasis in breast cancer patients, ensuring clinical applicability, cost-effectiveness, relative non-invasiveness, and accessibility of these models. Analysis was conducted on data from 416 patients across two centers, focusing on clinical blood markers (tumor markers, liver and kidney function indicators, blood lipid markers, cardiovascular biomarkers) and maximum lesion diameter from ultrasound. Feature reduction was performed using Spearman correlation and LASSO regression. Two models were built using LightGBM: a clinical model (using clinical blood markers) and a combined model (incorporating clinical blood markers and ultrasound features), validated in training, internal test, and external validation (test1) cohorts. Feature importance analysis was conducted for both models, followed by univariate and multivariate regression analyses of these features. The AUC values of the clinical model in the training, internal test, and external validation (test1) cohorts were 0.950, 0.795, and 0.883, respectively. The combined model showed AUC values of 0.955, 0.835, and 0.918 in the training, internal test, and external validation (test1) cohorts, respectively. Clinical utility curve analysis indicated the combined model's superior net benefit in identifying breast cancer with distant metastasis across all cohorts. This suggests the combined model's superior discriminatory ability and strong generalization performance. Creatine kinase isoenzyme (CK-MB), CEA, CA153, albumin, creatine kinase, and maximum lesion diameter from ultrasound played significant roles in model prediction. CA153, CK-MB, lipoprotein (a), and maximum lesion diameter from ultrasound positively correlated with breast cancer distant metastasis, while indirect bilirubin and magnesium ions showed negative correlations. This study successfully utilized clinical blood markers and ultrasound data to develop AI models for predicting distant metastasis in breast cancer. The combined model, incorporating clinical blood markers and ultrasound features, exhibited higher accuracy, suggesting its potential clinical utility in predicting and identifying breast cancer distant metastasis. These findings highlight the potential prospects of developing cost-effective and accessible predictive tools in clinical oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.