Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38969777›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2024

The use of intraluminal PRESERFLO stenting in avoiding early postoperative hypotony.

Raoul Verma-Fuehring, Mohamad Dakroub, Ahmed Bamousa, Gunda Kann, Jost Hillenkamp, Daniel Kampik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. 3-year real-world outcomes of standalone PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation - effectiveness and safety profile.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Prolene suture stenting: a novel approach to mitigate postoperative hypotony in PRESERFLO MicroShunt surgery.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Response to letter to the editor regarding "Prolene suture stenting: a novel approach to mitigate postoperative hypotony in PRESERFLO MicroShunt surgery".Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Raoul Verma-FuehringDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Würzburg (UKW), Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Mohamad DakroubDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Würzburg (UKW), Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Ahmed BamousaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Würzburg (UKW), Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Gunda KannDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Würzburg (UKW), Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Jost HillenkampDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Würzburg (UKW), Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Daniel KampikDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Würzburg (UKW), Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. kampik_d@ukw.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8613-5875

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePostoperative hypotony following PRESERFLO MicroShunt (PMS) implantation is a frequent cause of complications such as choroidal detachment and hypotony maculopathy. This study aims at evaluating the impact of intraluminal stenting of the PMS during the early postoperative period.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data of 97 patients who underwent PMS implantation with intraoperative placement of a Nylon 10-0 suture as intraluminal stent (PStent) and compared the outcomes to those of an existing database of the traditional MicroShunt implantation technique (PTrad, n = 120). The primary outcome measure was the intraocular pressure (IOP) at one week postoperatively. As a secondary outcome measure, adverse hypotony, defined as an IOP ≤ 5 mmHg with significant choroidal effusion and/or anterior chamber shallowing or the presence of macular folds was also assessed. Additionally, the time to stent removal and the IOP one week after stent removal were reported.

resultsPreoperative median IOP was 25.0 (20.5-30.3) mmHg in PStent and 25.0 (19.3-32.0) mmHg in PTrad (p = 0.62). One week after surgery, the median IOP dropped to 10.0 (8.0-13.0) mmHg in PStent and 7.0 (5.0-9.0) in PTrad (p < 0.01). At one month, the IOP was 12.0 (10.0-14.0) mmHg in PStent and 10.0 (8.0-11.0) mmHg in PTrad (p < 0.01). After 3 months, both groups showed similar median IOP levels of 11.0 (8.0-13.5) mmHg and 10.0 (9.75-13.0) mmHg in PStent and PTrad, respectively (p = 0.66). The presence of adverse hypotony was significantly lower in PStent compared to PTrad (6.2% vs 15.8%, p < 0.05). In PStent the stent was removed after 30.0 (21.0-42.5) days. One week after stent removal the mean IOP drop was 6.1 ± 0.5 mmHg (p < 0.01).

conclusionIn the early follow-up period, intraluminal stenting of the PMS appears to be safe and effective in controlling the IOP while reducing early postoperative hypotony. Surgical success is not compromised by stent placement. Based on our data, it is recommended to remove the suture two to six weeks after surgery for most patients with uncomplicated postoperative clinical findings.

Indexed as

Intraocular PressureOcular HypotensionPostoperative ComplicationsStentsAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlaucoma Drainage ImplantsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSuture TechniquesTime FactorsTonometry, OcularFiltering surgeryGlaucomaHypotonyIntraluminal stentingPreserflo MicroShunt

Identifiers

PMID38969777
PMCPMC11608340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.