Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38969752›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2025

Individualized time windows enhance TMS-EEG signal characterization and improve assessment of cortical function in schizophrenia.

Gema Mijancos-Martínez, Alejandro Bachiller, Inés Fernández-Linsenbarth, Sergio Romero, Leidy Y Serna, Vicente Molina, Miguel Ángel Mañanas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gema Mijancos-MartínezBiomedical Engineering Research Centre (CREB), Department of Automatic Control (ESAII), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain. gema.mijancos@upc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5594-4821
Alejandro BachillerBiomedical Engineering Research Centre (CREB), Department of Automatic Control (ESAII), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
Inés Fernández-LinsenbarthPsychiatry Department, School of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Sergio RomeroBiomedical Engineering Research Centre (CREB), Department of Automatic Control (ESAII), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
Leidy Y SernaBiomedical Engineering Research Centre (CREB), Department of Automatic Control (ESAII), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
Vicente MolinaPsychiatry Department, School of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Miguel Ángel MañanasBiomedical Engineering Research Centre (CREB), Department of Automatic Control (ESAII), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) recordings are crucial to directly assess cortical excitability and inhibition in a non-invasive and task-free manner. TMS-EEG signals are characterized by TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs), which are employed to evaluate cortical function. Nonetheless, different time windows (TW) have been used to compute them over the years. Moreover, these TWs tend to be the same for all participants omitting the intersubject variability. Therefore, the objective of this study is to assess the effect of using different TWs to compute the TEPs, moving from a common fixed TW to more adaptive individualized TWs. Twenty-nine healthy (HC) controls and twenty schizophrenia patients (SCZ) underwent single-pulse (SP) TMS-EEG protocol. Firstly, only the HC were considered to evaluate the TEPs for three different TWs in terms of amplitude and topographical distribution. Secondly, the SCZ patients were included to determine which TW is better to characterize the brain alterations of SCZ. The results indicate that a more individualized TW provides a better characterization of the SP TMS-EEG signals, although all of them show the same tendency. Regarding the comparison between groups, the individualized TW is the one that provides a better differentiation between populations. They also provide further support to the possible imbalance of cortical excitability/inhibition in the SCZ population due to its reduced activity in the N45 TEP and greater amplitude values in the N100. Results also suggest that the SCZ brain has a baseline hyperactive state since the TEPs of the SCZ appear earlier than those of the HC.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsSchizophreniaTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsYoung AdultCharacterizationIndividualizationSchizophreniaTEPTime windowTMS-EEG

Identifiers

PMID38969752
PMCPMC11946958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.