Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38969667›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Vaccination homophily in ego contact networks during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ádám Stefkovics, Fruzsina Albert, Anna Sára Ligeti, Beáta Dávid, Szilvia Rudas, Júlia Koltai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ádám StefkovicsNational Laboratory for Health Security, HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Fruzsina AlbertInstitute for Sociology, HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Anna Sára LigetiNational Laboratory for Health Security, HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Beáta DávidInstitute for Sociology, HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Szilvia RudasNational Laboratory for Health Security, HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Júlia KoltaiNational Laboratory for Health Security, HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Budapest, Hungary. koltai.julia@tk.hu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is an inevitable risk for societies as it contributes to outbreaks of diseases. Prior research suggests that vaccination decisions of individuals tend to spread within social networks, resulting in a tendency to vaccination homophily. The clustering of individuals resistant to vaccination can substantially make the threshold necessary to achieve herd immunity harder to reach. In this study, we examined the extent of vaccination homophily among social contacts and its association with vaccine uptake during the COVID-19 pandemic in Hungary using a contact diary approach in two cross-sectional surveys. The results indicate strong clustering among both vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. The most powerful predictor of vaccine uptake was the perceived vaccination rate within the egos' social contact network. Vaccination homophily and the role of the interpersonal contact network in vaccine uptake were particularly pronounced in the networks of close relationships, including family, kinship, and strong social ties of the ego. Our findings have important implications for understanding COVID-19 spread dynamics by showing that the strong clustering of unvaccinated individuals posed a great risk in preventing the spread of the disease.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinationAdolescentAdultAgedCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesEgoFemaleHumansHungaryMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Social NetworkingCOVID-19 VaccinesContact diaryCOVID-19Ego networksHomophilyVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID38969667
PMCPMC11226437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.