Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38969384›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Improving health system responses when patients are harmed: a protocol for a multistage mixed-methods study.

Peter D Hibbert, Louise Raggett, Charlotte J Molloy, Johanna Westbrook, Farah Magrabi, Virginia Mumford, Robyn Clay-Williams, Raghu Lingam, Paul M Salmon, Sandy Middleton and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Assessing the quality of patient safety incident investigation reports.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. What Do Consumers Need Before, During and After a Patient Safety Incident Review? A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  5. Perceptions and Experiences of Consumer Representatives on Patient Safety Investigation Teams: A Qualitative Analysis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Peter D HibbertAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia peter.hibbert@mq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7865-343X
Louise RaggettAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Charlotte J MolloyAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Johanna WestbrookAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1083-8192
Farah MagrabiAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Virginia MumfordAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7915-0615
Robyn Clay-WilliamsAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6107-7445
Raghu LingamSchool of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Paul M SalmonCentre for Human Factors and Sociotechnical Systems, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia.
Sandy MiddletonNursing Research Institute, St Vincent's Health Network Sydney and Australian Catholic University, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7201-4394
Mike RobertsSafer Care Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Patricia BraddClinical Excellence Commission, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Steven BowdenClinical Excellence Commission, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Kathleen RyanMid North Coast Local Health District, Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia.
Mark ZackaNorthern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Kirstine Sketcher-BakerClinical Excellence Queensland, Health Innovation and Research Branch, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Andy PhillipsSafer Care Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lanii BirksSafer Care Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Dinesh K AryaACT Health, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Catherine TrevorrowACT Health, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Suchit HandaAustralian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Girish SwaminathanAustralian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew Carson-StevensPRIME Centre Wales & Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7580-7699
Siri WiigCentre for Resilience in Healthcare (SHARE), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0186-038X
Carl de WetSouth West Hospital and Health Service, Roma, Queensland, Australia.
Elizabeth E AustinAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8438-2362
Brona Nic Giolla EaspaigAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ying WangAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Gaston ArnoldaAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4948-7633
Gregory M PetersonSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6764-3882
Jeffrey BraithwaiteAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0296-4957

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAt least 10% of hospital admissions in high-income countries, including Australia, are associated with patient safety incidents, which contribute to patient harm ('adverse events'). When a patient is seriously harmed, an investigation or review is undertaken to reduce the risk of further incidents occurring. Despite 20 years of investigations into adverse events in healthcare, few evaluations provide evidence of their quality and effectiveness in reducing preventable harm.This study aims to develop consistent, informed and robust best practice guidance, at state and national levels, that will improve the response, learning and health system improvements arising from adverse events. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The setting will be healthcare organisations in Australian public health systems in the states of New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria and the Australian Capital Territory. We will apply a multistage mixed-methods research design with evaluation and in-situ feasibility testing. This will include literature reviews (stage 1), an assessment of the quality of 300 adverse event investigation reports from participating hospitals (stage 2), and a policy/procedure document review from participating hospitals (stage 3) as well as focus groups and interviews on perspectives and experiences of investigations with healthcare staff and consumers (stage 4). After triangulating results from stages 1-4, we will then codesign tools and guidance for the conduct of investigations with staff and consumers (stage 5) and conduct feasibility testing on the guidance (stage 6). Participants will include healthcare safety systems policymakers and staff (n=120-255) who commission, undertake or review investigations and consumers (n=20-32) who have been impacted by adverse events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been granted by the Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (2023/ETH02007 and 2023/ETH02341).The research findings will be incorporated into best practice guidance, published in international and national journals and disseminated through conferences.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyResearch DesignAustraliaDelivery of Health CareFocus GroupsHumansMedical ErrorsPatient HarmQuality ImprovementClinical governanceQUALITATIVE RESEARCHQuality ImprovementQuality in health careSafety

Identifiers

PMID38969384
PMCPMC11227800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.