Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38969379›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Development and external validation of machine learning-based models to predict patients with cellulitis developing sepsis during hospitalisation.

Xilingyuan Chen, Li Hu, Rentao Yu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xilingyuan ChenChongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Li HuDepartment of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China rentaoyu@hotmail.com 993602708@qq.com.
Rentao YuDepartment of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China rentaoyu@hotmail.com 993602708@qq.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4952-9274

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCellulitis is the most common cause of skin-related hospitalisations, and the mortality of patients with sepsis remains high. Some stratification models have been developed, but their performance in external validation has been unsatisfactory. This study was designed to develop and compare different models for predicting patients with cellulitis developing sepsis during hospitalisation.

designThis is a retrospective cohort study.

settingThis study included both the development and the external-validation phases from two independent large cohorts internationally. PARTICIPANTS AND

methodsA total of 6695 patients with cellulitis in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive care (MIMIC)-IV database were used to develop models with different machine-learning algorithms. The best models were selected and then externally validated in 2506 patients with cellulitis from the YiduCloud database of our university. The performances and robustness of selected models were further compared in the external-validation group by area under the curve (AUC), diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic OR. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of interest in this study was the development based on the Sepsis-3.0 criteria during hospitalisation.

resultsPatient characteristics were significantly different between the two groups. In internal validation, XGBoost was the best model, with an AUC of 0.780, and AdaBoost was the worst model, with an AUC of 0.585. In external validation, the AUC of the artificial neural network (ANN) model was the highest, 0.830, while the AUC of the logistic regression (LR) model was the lowest, 0.792. The AUC values changed less in the boosting and ANN models than in the LR model when variables were deleted.

conclusionsBoosting and neural network models performed slightly better than the LR model and were more robust in complex clinical situations. The results could provide a tool for clinicians to detect hospitalised patients with cellulitis developing sepsis early.

Indexed as

CellulitisHospitalizationMachine LearningSepsisAdultAgedArea Under CurveFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveDermatologyInfectious diseases & infestationsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID38969379
PMCPMC11227788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.