Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38969355›Full record

SynthesisOccupational and environmental medicine2024

Effects of interventions implemented by occupational health professionals to prevent work-related stress complaints: a systematic review.

Suzanne Orhan Pees, Sandra van Oostrom, Hanneke Lettinga, Frederieke Schaafsma, Karin Proper

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Validity Evidence for the Secondary Symptoms of the Burnout Assessment Tool: A Brazilian Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suzanne Orhan PeesNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands suzanne.pees@rivm.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-7623-9497
Sandra van OostromNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3086-6641
Hanneke LettingaNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2569-980X
Frederieke SchaafsmaAmsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5827-7000
Karin ProperNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7016-1625

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Work-related stress complaints are a growing societal problem. Occupational health professionals often play a key role in its prevention. However, studies providing an overview of preventive interventions and their effectiveness are lacking. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to summarise the evidence on the effectiveness of interventions delivered by occupational health professionals to prevent work-related stress complaints.A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo and Medline was performed in May 2023 based on PICO (population, intervention, control and outcomes) elements. Inclusion criteria were: peer-reviewed papers with a randomised controlled trial design, quasi-experimental design and pre-post evaluations with a control group; working populations not on sick leave; interventions delivered by occupational health professionals; and stress outcomes. Data were extracted using a predefined extraction form, risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials (RoB-2) and Risk of Bias in non-randomised Studies-of Interventions tool, and a narrative analysis was performed to summarise data.Nine studies were included in this review and encompassed a diverse range of populations, interventions and professionals involved, outcome measures, and effects observed. Five studies found either mixed effects on stress outcomes, short-term positive effects, or positive effects in a subgroup of participants demonstrating high adherence to the intervention.As the results show mixed findings, a high risk of bias, and a limited number of studies was available, more research is needed to the effectiveness of the interventions and the factors underlying this.

Indexed as

Occupational StressHumansOccupational HealthOccupational Health ServicesBurnoutMental HealthOccupational HealthOccupational Stress

Identifiers

PMID38969355
PMCPMC11287568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.