ArticleExperimental hematology2024
Differences in the mutational landscape of clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential among races and between male and female patients with cancer.
Article in Experimental hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical decisions in clonal hematopoiesis: a contemporary review for clinicians.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Target practice: Opportunities for therapeutic intervention in CHIP and CCUS.Blood reviews · 2025Review
- Comprehensive analysis of the clinical feature, myeloid neoplasm-related gene mutation profiles and T cell diversity acquired pure red cell aplasia.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) has emerged as a significant precursor to hematological malignancies and is associated with several age-related diseases. We leveraged public data to explore differences in the mutational landscape of CHIP between males (Ms) and females (Fs) and across diverse racial populations. DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferase 3 alpha (DNMT3A) mutations were substantially more prevalent in Fs than in Ms (38.94% vs. 31.37%, p-value: < 0.001, q-value: < 0.001). Additional sex combs-like 1 (ASXL1) mutations were more frequent in Ms than Fs (5.82% vs. 2.69%, p-value < 0.001, q-value < 0.001). In the racial cohorts with sufficient sample sizes, STAT5B and CSF1R mutations were most frequent in Asian populations (1.40% and 0.84%), followed by Black populations (0.98% and 0.24%) and White populations (0.29% and 0.09%) (p-value: < 0.001 , q-value: 0.023 for both genes). Several other CHIP mutations were enriched in Black: RARA, SMAD2, CDKN1B, CENPA, CTLA4, EIF1AX, ELF3, MSI1, MYC, SOX17, and AURKA. On the other hand, H3C1, H3C4, and MYCL were enriched in the Asian cohort. Our analysis highlights sex and racial differences in CHIP mutations among patients with cancer. As CHIP continues to gain recognition as a critical precursor to malignancies and other diseases, understanding how these differences contribute to CHIP's underlying mechanisms and clinical implications is critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.