Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38968771›Full record

ReviewBiochemical and biophysical research communications2024

Shaping dynamical neural computations using spatiotemporal constraints.

Jason Z Kim, Bart Larsen, Linden Parkes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jason Z KimDepartment of Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. Electronic address: jk2557@cornell.edu.
Bart LarsenDepartment of Pediatrics, Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain, University of Minnesota, USA.
Linden ParkesDepartment of Psychiatry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA. Electronic address: linden.parkes@rutgers.edu.

Funding

Brain iron as a neurodevelopmental mechanism for transdianostic executive dysfunctionR00MH127293 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Bart Larsen · 2023 to 2026
$821k
Discovering prognostic neuroimaging biomarkers of the psychosis spectrum using network control theoryR00MH127296 · NIMH · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PARKES, LINDEN · 2023 to 2025
$747k
NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH127293NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH127296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamics play a critical role in computation. The principled evolution of states over time enables both biological and artificial networks to represent and integrate information to make decisions. In the past few decades, significant multidisciplinary progress has been made in bridging the gap between how we understand biological versus artificial computation, including how insights gained from one can translate to the other. Research has revealed that neurobiology is a key determinant of brain network architecture, which gives rise to spatiotemporally constrained patterns of activity that underlie computation. Here, we discuss how neural systems use dynamics for computation, and claim that the biological constraints that shape brain networks may be leveraged to improve the implementation of artificial neural networks. To formalize this discussion, we consider a natural artificial analog of the brain that has been used extensively to model neural computation: the recurrent neural network (RNN). In both the brain and the RNN, we emphasize the common computational substrate atop which dynamics occur-the connectivity between neurons-and we explore the unique computational advantages offered by biophysical constraints such as resource efficiency, spatial embedding, and neurodevelopment.

Indexed as

BrainModels, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsAnimalsHumansNerve NetSpatio-Temporal Analysis

Identifiers

PMID38968771
PMCPMC12005590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.