ArticlePLOS global public health2024
Effect modification of socioeconomic status in the association between contraception methods and couple's education: A secondary analysis of PDHS 2017-18.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Understanding Risk Factors for Unmet Contraceptive Needs Among Married and Cohabiting Women in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from 22 Countries.Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, the region of South Asia reports the highest number of women (87 million) with unmet needs of contraception. Amongst the lower-middle-income countries of South Asia, Pakistan has performed poorly in enhancing contraceptive prevalence, as evident by the Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (CPR) of 34%. Factors including restricted access to contraception, a restricted selection of techniques, cultural/religious resistance, gender-based hurdles, and societal factors, such as the couple's education level, are among the most important causes for this gap in desire and usage. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the association between couple's education level and their influence on their choice of contraception. In addition, the study also assessed the role of socioeconomic status in modifying the association between couple's education and contraception choice. Using PDHS 2017-18 data, couple's education status, preferences of contraceptive use and wealth quintiles were analyzed through multinomial logistic regression after adjusting for other confounding factors. The findings of our study revealed that out of the total sample of 14,368 women, 67.52% (n = 9701) were categorized as non-users, 23.55% (n = 3383) employed modern contraceptive methods, and 8.94% (n = 1284) utilized traditional contraceptive methods. Multivariable analysis showed that educated couples belonging to higher socioeconomic status (SES) had the highest adjusted odds ratio [7.66 (CI: 4.89-11.96)] of using modern contraceptives as opposed to uneducated couples of low socioeconomic statuses. Our analysis also revealed that the odds of using modern contraceptives were higher amongst mothers with five or more children [8.55 (CI:7.09-10.31)] as compared to mothers with less children when adjusted for other covariates. Thus, this study concludes the dynamic interplay between couple's level of education, contraceptive preference, and socioeconomic status This study contributes valuable insights for the policy makers and stakeholders to understand the intricate relationship between these factors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.