Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38968195›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Lateral frontoparietal effective connectivity differentiates and predicts state of consciousness in a cohort of patients with traumatic disorders of consciousness.

Riku Ihalainen, Jitka Annen, Olivia Gosseries, Paolo Cardone, Rajanikant Panda, Charlotte Martial, Aurore Thibaut, Steven Laureys, Srivas Chennu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Riku IhalainenDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Jitka AnnenComa Science Group, GIGA Consciousness Research Unit, University and University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7459-4345
Olivia GosseriesComa Science Group, GIGA Consciousness Research Unit, University and University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Paolo CardoneComa Science Group, GIGA Consciousness Research Unit, University and University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8537-2123
Rajanikant PandaComa Science Group, GIGA Consciousness Research Unit, University and University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Charlotte MartialComa Science Group, GIGA Consciousness Research Unit, University and University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Aurore ThibautComa Science Group, GIGA Consciousness Research Unit, University and University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Steven LaureysComa Science Group, GIGA Consciousness Research Unit, University and University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Srivas ChennuSchool of Computing, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6840-2941

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging studies have suggested an important role for the default mode network (DMN) in disorders of consciousness (DoC). However, the extent to which DMN connectivity can discriminate DoC states-unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) and minimally conscious state (MCS)-is less evident. Particularly, it is unclear whether effective DMN connectivity, as measured indirectly with dynamic causal modelling (DCM) of resting EEG can disentangle UWS from healthy controls and from patients considered conscious (MCS+). Crucially, this extends to UWS patients with potentially "covert" awareness (minimally conscious star, MCS*) indexed by voluntary brain activity in conjunction with partially preserved frontoparietal metabolism as measured with positron emission tomography (PET+ diagnosis; in contrast to PET- diagnosis with complete frontoparietal hypometabolism). Here, we address this gap by using DCM of EEG data acquired from patients with traumatic brain injury in 11 UWS (6 PET- and 5 PET+) and in 12 MCS+ (11 PET+ and 1 PET-), alongside with 11 healthy controls. We provide evidence for a key difference in left frontoparietal connectivity when contrasting UWS PET- with MCS+ patients and healthy controls. Next, in a leave-one-subject-out cross-validation, we tested the classification performance of the DCM models demonstrating that connectivity between medial prefrontal and left parietal sources reliably discriminates UWS PET- from MCS+ patients and controls. Finally, we illustrate that these models generalize to an unseen dataset: models trained to discriminate UWS PET- from MCS+ and controls, classify MCS* patients as conscious subjects with high posterior probability (pp > .92). These results identify specific alterations in the DMN after severe brain injury and highlight the clinical utility of EEG-based effective connectivity for identifying patients with potential covert awareness.

Indexed as

ConsciousnessConsciousness DisordersElectroencephalographyParietal LobeAdultBrain Injuries, TraumaticCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve NetPersistent Vegetative StatePositron-Emission Tomography

Identifiers

PMID38968195
PMCPMC11226086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.