Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38967975›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Overcoming Data Gaps in Life Course Epidemiology by Matching Across Cohorts.

Katrina L Kezios, Scott C Zimmerman, Peter T Buto, Kara E Rudolph, Sebastian Calonico, Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri, M Maria Glymour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Combining Observational Studies to Reduce Multiple Biases.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katrina L KeziosFrom the Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0001-7115-032
Scott C ZimmermanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, CA.
Peter T ButoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, CA.
Kara E RudolphFrom the Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-9417-7960
Sebastian CalonicoDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-9736-8949
Adina Zeki Al HazzouriFrom the Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.
M Maria GlymourDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-9644-3081

Funding

Building an unbiased pooled cohort for the study of lifecourse social and vascular determinants of Alzheimer's Disease and Related DisordersR01AG072681 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GLYMOUR, MEDELLENA MARIA, ZEKI AL HAZZOURI, ADINA · 2021 to 2025
$4.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG072681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Life course epidemiology is hampered by the absence of large studies with exposures and outcomes measured at different life stages in the same individuals. We describe when the effect of an exposure ( A ) on an outcome ( Y ) in a target population is identifiable in a combined ("synthetic") cohort created by pooling an early-life cohort including measures of A with a late-life cohort including measures of Y . We enumerate causal assumptions needed for unbiased effect estimation in the synthetic cohort and illustrate by simulating target populations under four causal models. From each target population, we randomly sampled early- and late-life cohorts and created a synthetic cohort by matching individuals from the two cohorts based on mediators and confounders. We estimated the effect of A on Y in the synthetic cohort, varying matching variables, the match ratio, and the strength of association between matching variables and A . Finally, we compared bias in the synthetic cohort estimates when matching variables did not d-separate A and Y to the bias expected in the original cohort. When the set of matching variables includes all variables d-connecting exposure and outcome (i.e., variables blocking all backdoor and front-door pathways), the synthetic cohort yields unbiased effect estimates. Even when matching variables did not fully account for confounders, the synthetic cohort estimate was sometimes less biased than comparable estimates in the original cohort. Methods based on merging cohorts may hasten the evaluation of early- and mid-life determinants of late-life health but rely on available measures of both confounders and mediators.

Indexed as

BiasCausalityCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID38967975
PMCPMC11305898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.