Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38967936›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

Viscoelastic, Optical, and Surgical Properties of Vitreous Body Replacement Hydrogels After Aging Compared to Porcine Vitreous Bodies And Silicone Oils.

Maximilian Hammer, Marcel Muuss, Lorenz Herbster, Jonathan Herth, Alexander Scheuerle, Ramin Khoramnia, Grzegorz Labuz, Philipp Uhl, Gerd Uwe Auffarth

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Hydrogel-Based Vitreous Substitutes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maximilian HammerDavid J Apple Laboratory for Vision Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marcel MuussDavid J Apple Laboratory for Vision Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lorenz HerbsterInstitute for Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jonathan HerthDavid J Apple Laboratory for Vision Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexander ScheuerleUniversity Eye Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ramin KhoramniaDavid J Apple Laboratory for Vision Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Grzegorz LabuzDavid J Apple Laboratory for Vision Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Philipp UhlInstitute for Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany.
Gerd Uwe AuffarthDavid J Apple Laboratory for Vision Research, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: First- (monomers), second- (pre-gelated), and third- (in situ gelating after injection) generation hydrogels were previously introduced to replace the vitreous body after vitrectomy surgery. In this study, we evaluated the surgical, optical, and viscoelastic properties of vitreous body replacement hydrogels before and after an accelerated aging protocol previously applied to intraocular implants. Methods: Measurements of injection force, removal speed using a clinically established vitrectomy setup, as well as evaluation of forward light scattering and viscoelastic properties before and after an accelerated aging protocol were conducted. Results were compared to porcine and human vitreous bodies, as well as currently clinically applied lighter- and heavier-than-water silicone oils. Results: Removal speed of all tested hydrogels is substantially lower than the removal speed of porcine vitreous body (0.2 g/min vs. 2.7 g/min for the best performing hydrogel and porcine vitreous body, respectively). Forward light scattering in second-generation vitreous body replacement hydrogels was higher after the aging process than the straylight of the average 70-year-old vitreous body (9.4 vs. 5.5 deg2/sr, respectively). The viscoelastic properties of all hydrogels did not change in a clinically meaningful manner; however, trends toward greater stiffness and greater elasticity after aging were apparent. Conclusions: This study demonstrates surgical weaknesses of the hydrogels that need to be addressed before clinical use, especially low removal speed. Pre-linked hydrogels (second-generation) showed inferior performance regarding surgical properties compared to in situ gelating hydrogels (third-generation). Translational Relevance: This study highlights possible pitfalls regarding surgical and optical properties when applying vitreous replacement hydrogels clinically.

Indexed as

HydrogelsSilicone OilsVitrectomyVitreous BodyAgedAgingAnimalsElasticityHumansSwineViscosityHydrogelsSilicone Oils

Identifiers

PMID38967936
PMCPMC11232910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.