Trial reportTranslational vision science & technology2024
Evaluating the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Portable, Motorized, and Remotely Controlled Slit Lamp Imaging Adaptor Prototype for Head-Mounted Displays.
Trial report in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Portable AI-powered scanning slit-light device for low-cost eye disease screening.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate the performance of a portable and remotely controlled slit lamp imaging adaptor. Methods: Twenty patients with anterior eye segment conditions participated in a randomized masked clinical trial. Imaging was performed using a Haag-Streit AG, BX 900 slit lamp biomicroscope and a new slit lamp prototype. Three ophthalmologists independently reviewed masked and randomized 2D images from both instruments and conducted physical eye examinations based on these images. Inter- and intra-grader reliability were assessed using kappa statistics, and sensitivity and specificity were determined with reference to the clinical eye examinations performed during the patients' visits. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the evaluations with the prototype were 47.8% and 64.1%. Similarly, the evaluations from the conventional system obtained a sensitivity and specificity of 49.5% and 66.2%. The differences in the sensitivity and specificity between imaging modalities were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The intra-grader reliability showed moderate to substantial agreement between the systems (κ = 0.522-0.708). The inter-grader reliability also indicated moderate agreement for the evaluations with the conventional system (κ = 0.552) and the prototype (κ = 0.474). Conclusions: This study presents a new prototype that exhibits diagnostic accuracy on par with conventional slit lamps and moderate reliability. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to characterize the prototype's performance. However, its remote functionality and accessibility suggest the potential to extend eye care. Translational Relevance: The development of portable and remotely controlled eye imaging systems will enhance teleophthalmology services and broaden access to eye care at the primary care level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.