Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38967913›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Identification of De Novo Dividing Stem Cells.

Dmitry I Maltsev, Oleg V Podgorny

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dmitry I MaltsevPirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Oleg V PodgornyPirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to alternate between quiescent and proliferating states is a remarkable feature of many types of somatic stem cells. The balance between quiescent and proliferating states is vital for maintenance of stem cells over the lifespan, and its disturbance may lead to premature depletion of the stem cell pool and loss of the tissue regenerative or renewal capacity at later stages of life. The question on how this balance is regulated is of critical importance in stem cell research and biology of aging. Assessment of the balance between quiescent and proliferating states has remained challenged until recently due to the lack of approaches for robust determination of the rate at which stem cells exit reversible cell cycle arrest. Here, we propose a simple method for detection of those stem cells that have entered the division cycle after a prolonged period of quiescence.The method combines cumulative and pulse labeling with thymidine analogues 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) and 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU). In the discussed labeling scheme, cells that have incorporated only the second label, EdU, are de novo dividing cells. The suggested double labeling method provides quantitative assessment of the rate at which stem cells exit the quiescent state and allows the fates of de novo dividing stem cells to be traced.

Indexed as

Cell DivisionStem CellsAnimalsBromodeoxyuridineCell ProliferationDeoxyuridineHumansMiceStaining and Labeling5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridineBromodeoxyuridineDeoxyuridineAgingCell cycleOsmotic minipumpsQuiescent stem cellsThymidine analogues

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.