ArticlePediatric surgery international2024
Late diagnosis of anorectal malformation: how good is good enough?
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imperforate Anus With Perineal Fistula in an Infant Presenting With Constipation and Abscesses: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Delays in Care for Children With Low Anorectal Malformations in Southwestern Uganda.The Journal of surgical research · 2025Article
- Delayed diagnosis of anorectal malformations: a call for standardization of the current definitions.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNational data from the United Kingdom reported in 2016 have suggested that almost one quarter of babies with anorectal malformation (ARM) have a delay in diagnosis. The UK's Newborn Infant Physical Examination dictates a perineal examination should be performed within 72 h of birth. We sought to describe a tertiary single-centre experience of late presentation in the most recent 5 years.
methodsA single-centre prospective registry of ARM patients (July 2018-March 2024) was analysed. Timing of presentation with anomaly was noted. Patients presenting > 72 h or having been discharged home were defined as a delayed diagnosis. Factors associated with delayed diagnosis were noted.
resultsSixty patients were included, of whom nine (15%) were diagnosed after 72 h [range 4-279 days]. This represents a non-significant improvement compared to 39/174 (22%) late diagnosed cases in the BAPS-CASS cohort from 2016 to 17 (p = 0.188). Presenting symptoms of obstruction (i.e. distension, vomiting, megarectum) were more common in late diagnosed patients (4/9 (44%) vs. 1/51(2%); p = 0.001). Anomalies producing meconium on the perineum were more likely to be diagnosed late (8/32 (25%) vs 1/28 (4%); p = 0.029). Complications and changes to clinical management for these cases are presented.
conclusionAlthough our regional rates of late diagnosis appear to be lower than previously reported national rates, there remains a significant number of infants who are diagnosed late especially those with visible perineal openings. These infants are more commonly symptomatic; entraining additional risks associated with an emergency presentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.