Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38967769›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2024

Instrumentless liver suspension for liver retraction in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.

Michael Ginesini, Virginia Viti, Allegra Ripolli, Ugo Boggi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael GinesiniDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Virginia VitiDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Allegra RipolliDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Ugo BoggiDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. u.boggi@med.unipi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7505-5896

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The popularity of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) is increasing, yet it remains a complex procedure. Outcomes are influenced by various factors, including patient-specific variables, disease characteristics, and surgical technique. Numerous and intricate details contribute to the technical success of RPD. In this study, our focus is on achieving effective and "gentle" liver retraction. The use of liver retractors has been associated with the risk of retractor-related liver injury (RRLI), which can have serious consequences. Here, we introduce a refined technique for instrumentless liver retraction in RPD, developed progressively through a series of over 300 procedures. The core concept of this technique involves suspending the liver to the diaphragmatic dome. This is accomplished by securing the round ligament to the anterior abdominal wall using transparietal sutures and attaching the fundus of the gallbladder and the anterior margin of liver segment number 3 to the diaphragm. Our consecutive series of over 300 RPDs demonstrates the feasibility and safety of this approach, with no clinically relevant RRLI observed. Instrumentless liver retraction offers a valuable refinement in RPD, streamlining the procedure while reducing potential complications associated with dedicated retractors.

Indexed as

LiverPancreaticoduodenectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleLiver injuryLiver retractionMinimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomyPostoperative complicationsRetractor-related liver injuryRobotic pancreatoduodenectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.